The Great Commission, Love, and Science

Go into all the world and preach the gospel to the whole creation.”

I have written a previous post about the Great Commission, as recorded in the Gospel of Mark, which is the basis for Christian missionary activity for the past two thousand years.

But the Great Commission is about much more: it is the driving force of love in Christianity, and perhaps, a driving force behind science during the past two millennia.

Commissioners, those acting upon the Commission of Christ, to spread the Good News, the Word, to the whole creation, are, in short, spreading love to the whole creation.

Commissioners traveled, explored, discovered, met with others, learned. All that they learned of God’s creation, natural and human, served to increase knowledge, that is, to penetrate a bit of what God is the sum of.

To work for, travel for, sacrifice for, God, is to have faith. Faith in God yields faith in self. God is the unyielding source of power and strength, the food that continually feeds, the drive that never ceases, the love that never forsakes. Love of God yields love for all of God’s creation, including love for self, love for humankind, love for nature. Love of self is the propeller for action to move in time according to a set purpose. When one feels God’s love one feels love itself, toward oneself and toward others.

It is noteworthy that the Apostle Paul makes this love for God and God’s creation the first point in his writings. In Paul’s first epistle, not in order of when written but in the New Testament–the Letter to the Romans–he said that since the beginning of time the creation itself is a testimony of God’s works and love; this awareness of God in nature is intuitive to humans, and it takes great arrogance to deny God’s existence when it is apparent in all that we see. If all humans sense God, and God is love, then all humans know God’s love. The more we know of nature, the more we know of God.

The key to world peace, to peaceful interaction, not confrontation, among peoples, is the ability to feel consciously God’s love, to encourage and sense it in others, and to share it with those who have not yet sensed it. The missionary’s ultimate goal is therefore spreading the love of God. To spread it is to feel it, to know it in oneself, and it is to recognize it in all God’s works.

This is the essence of piety, to feel overwhelming love for God because of awareness of all God’s gifts of knowledge, life, love, purpose. What God has given is awe-inspiring. The pious scientist studies natural and human history to achieve this awareness. Natural and human history, seeing God’s works over time and the wonderful intricate patterns and consistency of it all, yields continual piety, awe, in God’s plan and God’s creation. The scientist who examines cause and effect, patterns, explanations for phenomena in human and natural history, discovers God’s consistency, regularity, and order—in short, God’s love. The study of natural history is therefore the study of the origins and reasons behind the whole creation.

As the Gospel of John says, through Him [the Word] all things came to be. It has only been in the past century and a half that some humans have decided that science and religion are at odds. But to examine the history of science for the many centuries before the 1800s is to see that science and religion were joint enterprises leading to the same goal: knowledge of God.

Perhaps the skepticism among scientists, philosophers, even theologians of the past 150 years is an aberration in the whole course of things. Perhaps as our knowledge grows of the unity among all things in the universe we will become aware again that love is the basis for the entire creation. Knowing that love is behind all things, perhaps we will commit ourselves to loving all things: other humans, animals, the environment, the Earth, the universe.

For an example of an American missionary, see

Posted in American History, Biography, Christianity, Great Commission | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

Rescuing the Dead

One of my favorite authors is Captain John Smith. Smith, the founder of Jamestown, of Pocahontas fame, was a contemporary of John Donne, William Shakespeare, and Francis Bacon. Smith did not write poetry like Donne, sonnets and plays like Shakespeare, or essays like Bacon; Smith wrote largely autobiographical histories, mostly of his adventures in America. His style is earthy and unrehearsed, plain yet often satirical, and above all, brutally honest.

Captain John Smith was the first historian of America. He defined history, in one of his final books, Advertisements for the Unexperienced Planters of New England, as “the memory of time” and “the life of the dead.” History has been kind to Smith, because he is well-remembered, even four hundred years after the founding of Jamestown. But to most of the dead, history is not kind, particularly to the millions upon millions of anonymous everyday common men and women of the past.

I have tried in my books to follow Smith’s definition of history as “the life of the dead.” The job of the historian is, in short, to rescue the dead.

During the past year I have written a 300 page history of Bacone College, during the course of which I have aimed to “rescue the dead.” How does one accomplish this? How are the dead to be rescued and, in Smith’s words, given life?

In one respect the remains of the dead are all around us. On this campus, in these buildings, on these grounds, the dead were once alive, were once living, breathing humans laughing, crying, experiencing pleasure and pain. But for most people who have lived, worked, and studied at Bacone College over its 135 years, they are long gone, now just simply dead.

The remains of the dead are often governed by chance. Most of what has happened in the past, the actions, words, feelings, of people long dead, have disappeared, are irrecoverable. Fortunately Bacone had a library, and had people, especially faculty and administrators, who wanted to preserve the past and the present, who believed that there was a historical significance to Bacone College. Hence for many years materials and books were deposited in the library in the basement of Samuel Richard Hall. Some are yet there. Most have been moved to the new Betts Library. They were allowed over the years to accumulate dust and mold; some were lost; many have been recovered and restored. Through these documents and photos and other material remains the historian can try to reconstruct the past, to bring life to the dead.

For some people of Bacone’s past, this is quite easy. Almon Bacone, for example, the namesake of the college, left his mark on it in more than his name: his shadow, as it were, falls all across the campus: in its aims and goals, curriculum and reason to exist. Bacone left behind some works—manuscripts, letters, photographs, as well as his body. Yes, that’s right, Bacone College has a cemetery located north of the President’s residence. Almon Bacone was buried in this cemetery in 1896, and he yet still lies there. So there is a very real presence of Almon Bacone on this campus.

Almon Bacone was not the first person buried in the cemetery. He was proceeded by at least one person, a teacher named Alfred Shoemaker. Shoemaker was a Baptist minister in Philadelphia who in 1886 felt the call to travel west and minister to the American Indians. He arrived at Indian University—the original name of the college—in 1886, and taught for only three months before he succumbed to illness. He became quite popular during his short stint, so that everyone—students, faculty, administration, trustees—were affected by his death. People recalled that only a week or two before his death, he had told the students of life, “It is but a shadow. It lasts only an hour; only an hour.” These words are etched on his monument.

Bacone joined Shoemaker ten years later. On his granite monument are these words:

“In memory of Almon C. Bacone President and founder of Indian University, Indian territory. Born April 25, 1830, died April 33, 1896. Erected by his wife, children, pupils, and friends. No man in Indian Territory was more greatly esteemed and loved than President Bacone, who rests from his labors, but his works follow him. ‘Let me die the death of the righteous, and let my last end be like his.’ Numbers 23,10. ‘A Christian school planted in the midst of a people, becomes one of the most powerful agencies in the work of civilization.’ ACB. Hundreds of Indian youth were inspired to a higher life by him, who was actuated by the above and like principles.”

Benjamin Weeks realized, during the course of his twenty-three year administration, which lasted from 1918 to 1941, that Bacone College had been and still was Almon Bacone’s college—Weeks emulated Bacone in everything: mission of the school, curriculum, emphasis on Christianity, reaching out to American Indians. Upon Weeks’s death in 1950, the new president of the college, Francis Thompson, directed the memorial service, during which these lines from Tennyson’s “Crossing the Bar” were read:

“Sunset and evening star,

And one clear call for me

And may there be

no moaning of the bar

When I put out to sea.”

The Bacone Indian, the student driven newspaper of the 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s, quoted just as aptly from the words of English architect Christopher Wren’s gravestone: “If you would see his memorial, look about you.” Indeed, most of the buildings then and now that stand about the Bacone campus are from Weeks’s administration.

Thirteen years before, Benjamin Weeks preached at the memorial service honoring

Mary Prosser Jayne, long-time missionary to the Cheyenne, Arapaho, and Pawnee, who was laid to rest in the Bacone cemetery. During the late 1920s and 1930s, in retirement from active missionary work, Jayne was matron of Barnett Hall, the boy’s dormitory. As she became more feeble, she built a small cottage on campus. Here she died January 5, 1937. President Weeks said of Jayne: “When [the students] were sick, she was their physician; when they were in trouble, she suffered with them; when they were in sorrow, she was their comforter. Words, of which she was so great a master, were not needed for the lesson she taught them. They learned from her a way of life, and they will never forget it.” Her headstone reads: “Mary Prosser Jayne, 1867-1937; Thirty-six years a missionary to the Indians of Oklahoma; Faith, Service, Immortality.”

In death, of course, there are no rich and poor, no great and obscure. Death’s egalitarianism is represented in the Bacone cemetery, where alongside presidents and their wives, faculty, and missionaries, are the graves of people for whom there is no record—they are unknown, at least to us. Such is M. Parker Sleeper, buried in 1891; Bessie Lee Cowan, an infant buried in 1907; and Baby Spinks, buried in 1953. Little is known of these people save their names. Others lying at rest were current and former students when they died. One lonely monument stands to commemorate the life of Abel Archibald, who died in his 23rd year. Abel and his twin brother Cain attended Bacone from 1910 to 1918; they were orphans who lived at the Murrow Indian Orphan’s Home, founded by Joseph Samuel Murrow in Atoka, Oklahoma, and relocated to the Bacone campus in 1910. The Archibald brothers were Creek Indians. Bacone at the time they attended mostly instructed students in the primary and secondary grades; there were also a few college students. Cain and Abel slowly moved from the third to the seventh grades during the eight years that they attended Bacone. Abel succumbed to meningitis in 1921. Another Indian student who lived in the orphanage and attended Bacone was Lovina Wallace, born in 1909, who attended the first grade from 1915 to 1918, and died February 25, 1918. Likewise Solomon Folsom was a sixteen-year old fifth-grader, Bacone student and orphan, when he died in 1915.

In January, 1909, before the Murrow Orphans’s home moved to Bacone, while still at Atoka, ten-year-old Solomon wrote a letter to Joseph Murrow:

“Dear Uncle Row:

I am glad holidays are over and I can go to school again. Miss Rogers says I can soon get into another reader. I like the Bible study. I am beginning to read in the Bible I bought. . . . I love you and Aunt Row.

Your little boy, Solomon Folsom”

Aunt Row was Mrs. Murrow, the former Kate Ellet, who was an instructor at Indian University in the 1880s before she married Joseph Murrow, known to students as Father Murrow, or Uncle Row.

When Solomon Folsom died in 1915, the same year that the Jefferson Highway began, one hundred years ago, students dedicated the school newspaper, the Bacone Chief, to Uncle Row, proclaiming:

Today, a man’s life is reckoned in terms of service rendered. This man has served all men by carrying the Gospel to those who had not heard the call and by helping to establish institutions of learning which have been the means of educating thousands of Indian boys and girls. He has lived a conscientious and godly life. And by doing so, he has ennobled many characters. He is looked upon as a ‘Father’ by many of the Indians. He has the honor of being a member of the committee who helped to establish this university.

There were several hundred students in attendance at Bacone College in 1915. The President, J. Harvey Randall, the pastor the Bacone Baptist Church, and the sixteen members of the faculty and staff, many of whom had been missionaries, promulgated the Word of Christ to the students of the college, most of whom were American Indian. The year before, the Bacone Baptistry, which still stands, was constructed, and dozens of students every year were baptized by the college chaplain and area ministers. Chapel and church services, of which there were many, were held in the chapel, which had been opened in 1914 in Rockefeller Hall. Under Randall, as under his predecessors and successors, the College operated through the generosity of the American Baptist Home Mission Society, wealthy alumni, such as Patrick Hurley, and regional goodwill. Few students had adequate resources to pay for their schooling. All students worked to contribute toward their tuition, room and board. The College, surrounded by acres of land, grew crops and raised livestock. The local newspaper, the Muskogee Times-Democrat, reported that Bacone crops “are the best in the surrounding neighborhood. The farm is also well stocked with a high grade of horses, cattle and hogs, there being some especially fine registered cattle and hogs on the farm.” In 1916, the College purchased “four handsome and aristocratic Holsteins,” making “the Bacone college herd . . . the finest of its class in Oklahoma.” Randall announced “that the farm now has nine of the best Holsteins in the United States, two males and seven females.” Students adopted “the Holstein as the official college cow.” As successful was the poultry farm; many regional Indians bought their poultry from Bacone.

Nevertheless sometimes the college finances were tight, and the menu for breakfast, lunch, and dinner restricted. One student commemorated the Bacone diet, rhyming:

There’s nothing like Bacone beans,

That are eaten by the Bacone fiends.

Beans, beans, beans, morning, noon and night,

Baked, stewed, and fried they are just all right.

Beans in the porridge, beans in the pot,

Beans served cold, beans served hot.

Bean bag socials, beans in College,

Beans, beans, beans make more knowledge.

Bacone College was connected to Muskogee by rail and, in 1915, a highway. Students took the trolley to the city on day’s off. Oklahoma was a dry state (in terms of alcoholic beverages), but there were a number of ne’er-do-wells who brewed and sold illegal spirits. In April, 1915, one man, Charles House, sold liquor to a couple of Indian boys who attended the college. The liquor was “rotten,” and the boys became extremely intoxicated, and landed in jail. The next day, President Randall bailed them out, and addressed a crowd of Muskogee businessmen. “Tears” streamed “down his face.” Randall appealed to the citizens of Muskogee to do something, which they did. The sheriff raided liquor “joints” in an attempt to stifle drinking and gambling.

To try to keep the students occupied the College in 1915 had a the Sacajawea Literary Society for girls and the Sequoyah Literary Society for boys; an active YMCA and YWCA; vocal and instrumental music lessons; holiday parties, picnics, and frequent socials; and athletics such as football, basketball, “soccer football,” baseball, tennis, and track. Boys learned manual training, working with tools, and girls learned domestic science, cooking and sewing. Boys lived in Rockefeller Hall, on the west side of campus, while girls lived in Sacajawea Hall, on the east side of campus. In-between was an area for walking, talking, thinking, and holding hands known as the “heart.” Romance was, however, under the watchful eyes of faculty and administrators, and typically boys and girls could woo only on supervised Sunday afternoons.

There are several unmarked graves in the cemetery, mere stones signifying a person’s remains, one of whom belongs to Janet Treat Rice, daughter of Professor and Mrs. Ambrose C. Rice. Ambrose Rice taught science at Indian University. He was a former Baptist missionary serving in Burma, as were so many of the faculty and staff in 1915. Rice had taught at the Rangoon Baptist College until 1910. He came to Bacone in July, 1912, and his family prepared to move into a “cottage south of the street car line,” a bit away from the center of campus. His little girl Janet, 3 years and ten months old, died July 22, and was buried July 26, 1912.

A colleague of Professor Rice and fellow missionary, Prof. W. A. Seward Sharp, who taught Bible at Indian University, wrote a poem in commemoration of Janet:

Oh thou my bonnie blue-eyed girl

With laughing glee and song,

I’ve wondered, if we worshipped thee,

Our hearts were sadly wrong.

How oft thy head of golden curls,

Brought sunshine in our home,

And led our hearts to follow thee,

Where’er thy feet did roam.

With dimpled hands to help us work

Our labors turned to play,

The darkest hours thy face beguiled

And night was turned to day.

We may not worship thee, ’tis true,

But we shall ever love,

And give again, our gift, to God,

To take thee safe above.

My child, whene’er our Father speaks,

We bow in humble prayer,

And when our toil on earth is done,

We’ll join thee over there.

The verse tells us something of the little girl: that she had blue eyes and sun-shine hair that matched a sunny disposition; she loved to laugh and sing; her parents and all about her adored her; she had soft, plump hands and sometimes helped her mother and father and siblings in simple chores. She was a blessing, and made those who watched her buried yearn to join her in the hereafter.

Yet Janet Rice has been dead for 103 years, and when she died she was but a child, having accomplished nothing comparable to the likes of Almon Bacone, whose monument dominates the cemetery. Many people remember Almon Bacone; few have heard of, much less remember, Janet Rice.

No image, no epitaph, recalls her for us; only a poem.

Michel de Montaigne, the French essayist of the sixteenth century, who spent so many years pondering life and death, had a response to this juxtaposition of the great and memorable and small and insignificant. “We are great fools. ‘He has spent his life in idleness,’ we say, and ‘I have done nothing today.’ What! Have you not lived? That is not only the fundamental, but the most noble of your occupations. ‘If I had been put in charge of some great affair, I might have shown what I could do.’ Have you been able to reflect on your life and control it? Then you have performed the greatest work of all. . . . Our duty is to compose our character, not to compose books, to win not battles and provinces, but order and tranquility in our conduct. Our great and glorious masterpiece is to live appropriately.”

During Janet Rice’s three years, she brought joy to many, and lived appropriately.

Life is a series of singular moments that follow one upon another. In such moments of time are often found a brief portrait of the whole. Hopefully our examination into a singular moment of time that occurred a century ago has allowed us a glimpse into the life of otherwise forgotten or lesser known people, to resurrect, if for a few minutes, the memory of, in John Smith’s words, “the life of the dead.”

Posted in Christianity | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Captain John Smith: Conqueror, Colonizer, Commissioner

The Sea Mark: Captain John Smith’s Voyage to New England, published by University Press of New England (http://www.upne.com/1611685169.html), juxtaposes three different mentalities and activities: the conqueror, colonizer, and commissioner.

Smith the conqueror was a soldier who believed that whoever was in the way of his interest, that is England’s interest, was expendable.

Smith the colonizer believed it was his and England’s destiny to expand power, increase wealth (and possessions), and control.

Smith the commissioner believed it was his and England’s job to act on the Great Commission, that of Christ to spread the Gospel to all nations.

Are these contradictory or commensurate? What kind of personality combines these three disparate mentalities and activities?

Today, Smith’s three mentalities—conqueror, colonizer, commissioner—appear contradictory, but to him, in his time, they were commensurate.

Smith was an Anglican, convinced that God’s Providence was at work throughout time and in Smith’s own life.

It was God’s will, Smith believed, that he engage in these, to him, commensurate activities of conquering, colonizing, and commissioning the Gospel to the Indians.

The Sea Mark: John Smith’s Voyage to New England, tells the story of this complex man, John Smith, in the context of his 1614 voyage along the northeast American coast, during which he christened the land, New England.

Posted in American History, Biography, books, Christianity, Great Commission | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

College Students, College Thinkers

Students…
Why are you at college?
What brought you to college?
What motivated you to come to a college rather than to stay where you were, to continue what you were doing?
There are many possibilities…a degree program in criminal justice, health science, physical science, social science, humanities…athletics…a family connection…the expectation that you should do something more, earn more, achieve more…
I submit that something more fundamental was at work in bringing you to college.
Four hundred years ago there lived a great philosopher and mathematician, Rene Descartes. Perhaps you have heard of him. Descartes was one of the great thinkers of his age, seventeenth century Europe. Descartes lived at a time of doubt. There were new theories in science, and dramatic changes to Christianity. Scientists like Galileo were questioning the earth-centered conception of the universe. Protestant theologians, following the lead of Martin Luther, were questioning the very foundations of Christianity. Descartes was not sure what to believe, what was real, what was true. He was a doubter, a questioner, a skeptic. He was one of those who refuse to believe something just because it is taught him. He needed absolute proof before he would commit himself to a system of thought. In his quest for knowledge, for truth, he decided to reduce his search to whatever he could know for certain, without any doubt. He arrived at one principle, one thing in existence that he could not doubt. Existence itself. If he was able to doubt, then he clearly existed. If he was able to doubt, he clearly was able to think. “I am a thinking thing,” he said. He was aware of his own existence; “I am,” he said. And he declared, “I think, therefore I am.” He knew he existed because he was a thinker.
“I think, therefore I am.” Consider this proclamation. There are two things that we all share, two things we are certain of. We are thinkers. We exist.
What does it mean, to think? Descartes wrote: “What then is it that I am? A thinking thing. What is a thinking thing? It is a thing that doubts, understands, affirms, denies, wills, abstains from willing, that also can be aware of images and sensations.” As a thinker he was able to consider, to conceptualize, to analyze, to objectify, to observe, to seek, to question, to answer. To think, to be aware of existence, is to consider time, to reflect upon the past, to anticipate the future, to be aware of action in the present. Thinkers continually examine what is outside themselves according to what is on the inside, that is, they judge the “other” according to the “self.” Thinkers are able to break from the concern of only satisfying their own needs; they are able to break from selfishness; they able to reach out to others, to learn from them, to understand them. Thinkers can consider the foreign without fear. Thinkers can break from fear of the unknown, to make it known. As the Apostle John said in his first epistle, “love knows no fear.” In short, the more one thinks, the more one loves.

“I think, therefore I am.” Someone else proclaimed “I am.” In the Gospel of John, Jesus tells the Jews that he has always existed, that he is the “I am.” And indeed, when we think, we become “I am.” Thinking allows us to know who we are, where we came from, where we are going. Thinking allows us to transcend the moment, to consider not just the present but the past and the future as well. Thinking gives us the ability to see what is transcendent, what is divine, within us.

I believe what brought you to college is not so much academics, athletics, or programs, but the fact that you are a thinker. As a thinker, you ask questions, you seek answers. And there is no better place to question and seek answers than a liberal arts college. This is where you can really think!

undefined

Rene Descartes

Posted in Christianity, General Essays | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The History of Bacone College Symbolized by a Single Work of Art

The Indian Christ in Gethsemane, a painting by Cheyenne artist Dick West, tells the story of the history of Bacone College.

It portrays a young Plains Indian as Christ in western Oklahoma kneeling before God the Father, praying, “Thy Will be Done.”

Dick West’s Cheyenne name was Wah-pah-nah-yah. He grew up on the Cheyenne Reservation in western Oklahoma. The Cheyenne had been relocated to western Oklahoma in the 1870s. They struggled with trying to adjust to a farming lifestyle in an inhospitable environment. The buffalo had long been their mainstay, but in Oklahoma they tried to live on government cattle; they fought against despair, disease, and resentment.

In the 1890s Baptist missionaries arrived at the Cheyenne reservation. One was Robert Hamilton. Another was Mary Jayne. Hamilton struggled to bring the Gospel to a people who were searching for the path or road that would take them from the despair and loss of hope that they felt. Hamilton told them of the Jesus Road: this road would take them from hunger and thirst to satisfaction, from pain and suffering to peace and hope, from the dismal past to the glorious future.

The Cheyenne were reluctant; the traditional tribal road took them on the road of their forefathers, the road where the someday the Indian would be avenged, the road back to the buffalo.

Hamilton was untiring. He relied on Cheyenne interpreters to bring the message of the Jesus Road, and persevered in his goal to fulfill Christ’s Great Commission.

One who had lost her son said that when he died, she had been tempted to throw away the Jesus Road, and take up again her old heathen religion, but that now she could see that it was better to trust in Jesus, and that she could see that His way was right, she asked the church to forgive her for her sinful thoughts, and promised to walk in the ‘Road’ more carefully.”

He was soon joined, in the 1890s, by Mary Jayne, a Baptist missionary from Iowa. She ministered to such people as Lightfoot West, his wife Rena Flying Coyote, and their young son, Wah-pah-nah-yah.

The young boy grew up following the Jesus Road. When he was of school age he attended Concho Indian School, then Haskell Indian School, then in 1936 came to Bacone College. He was now know as W. Richard, “Dick”, West: at Bacone, where he played football, his nickname was Bull West.

Mary Jayne, after a long career as a minister, had been matron to the boy’s dormitory at Barnett Hall, though when Bull West matriculated in 1936 she was in ill health, and died the next year. Bull West served as a pall bearer at her funeral.

At Bacone, Bull West studied art under Acee Blue Eagle and fell in love with piano instructor Maribelle McCrea. After graduating from Bacone, Dick West studied art under Oscar Jacobsen at the University of Oklahoma, then returned to Bacone to marry Maribelle. After serving in World War II, Dick and Maribelle returned to Bacone after the war, Dick teaching art, Maribelle teaching piano.

Tragedy came to this couple in 1952. Maribelle was diagnosed with a brain tumor and was given only half a chance to survive. During the experience of surgery and recovery, Dick painted the Indian Christ in Gethsemane. “Thy Will be Done.”

Maribelle’s friend Margaret Erickson wrote in her Memoirs: “the surgeon said to Dick later, ‘There is something about your wife, something I don’t understand. There was a serenity in our surgery, a serenity in and about your wife that I can’t explain.’ Well, Dick could explain it.”

Maribelle survived, of course. Years later, when Dick was showing a series of paintings called The Indian Christ, including the Indian Christ in Gethsemane, to Plains Indians in western Oklahoma, an “old Comanche Christian . . . said to him, ‘If we had those pictures in the early days when the missionaries first told us about Jesus, it would have helped us to understand him better’.”

The Indian Christ in Gethsemane symbolizes the history of Bacone College.

Bacone was founded in the 1880s by Baptist missionaries to the American Indians. From the beginning it was a source of Christian thought and culture, teaching the Jesus Road, to a peripatetic people who had suffered much and had been forsaken. But as the Chief of the Delawares and one of the original trustees of Bacone College, Charles Journeycake, wrote:

“We have been broken up and moved six times. We have been despoiled of our property. We thought when we moved across Missouri River and had paid for our home in Kansas we were safe, but in a few years the white man wanted our country. We had good farms, built comfortable houses and big barns. We had schools for our children and churches where we listened to the same gospel the white man listens to. The white man came into our country from Missouri and drove our cattle and horses away and if our people followed them they were killed. We try to forget these things but we could not forget that the white man brought us the blessed gospel, the Christian’s hope. This more than pays for all we have suffered.”

For 135 years the college has struggled to survive, struggled to find its path, struggled to keep to the Jesus Road at the same time as trying to direct others on the same path. All of the pitfalls that can be put in the human path—poverty, disease, war, hubris, sin—have been put in the path of this college. And yet it still endures. Why?

If there is an answer to this question, it is, I believe, revealed in Dick West’s painting, Indian Christ in Gethsemane. West and his wife prayed and persevered, accepted God’s will and continued to work, did what they could according to the grace of God.

Live, pray, act, work, and teach others: what more can we do?

For more on the Baptist missionaries of Oklahoma and artists such as West, see Marking the Jesus Road: Bacone College through the Years, newly republished in January 2026 and available on Amazon at Marking the Jesus Road: Bacone College through the Years: Lawson, Dr. Russell Matthew: 9780977244805: Amazon.com: Books

Posted in Christianity, Great Commission | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Love and the Constitution

Love and the Constitution

Is our society founded on Christian virtues and teachings? What is the greatest Christian teaching? What is the essence of Christianity? What is the one truth above all others that sums Christianity, Christian teachings, Jesus’s life?

Love.

If our society is a Christian society, and if our society is founded on Christian teachings, wouldn’t we find the essence of Christianity in our basic documents upon which we order our society?

The Constitution is the supreme law of the land. It is the basic document upon which we order society.

How many times is the word love found in the Constitution? In the Amendments? In the Declaration of Independence?

None.

Love is not found in the Constitution? Why?

The essence of the Constitution is the Preamble. It tells us the basic teachings of the Constitution.

“We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union,
establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common
defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

The Preamble shows us the Constitution is about order, union, justice, tranquility, defense, the most good for the most people, liberty.

What does the New Testament teach us about Love?

Paul on Love (1Corinthians, 13):

“Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.”

Following Paul, could there be a government based on patience, kindness, modesty, humility, honor, self-sacrifice, forgiveness, goodness, the truth, trust, hope, perseverance, protection?

Aristotle argued that the best form of government is democracy, and that the state has to encourage in its people, Virtue.

Aristotle’s concept of Virtue: people who do an act for its own sake.

In other words, Virtue is an act for the sake of Love.

Does our government encourage virtue as Aristotle defined it? Or does government impede virtue?

Imagine a government based on love, a government of love. What would it look like? Would it look like the America of today? Does the America of today, the government of today, have a chance to make a society, a government, based on love?

Perhaps the key to love is freedom. God loves us and grants us freedom to love Him back. The more freedom government allows us, perhaps the more love is possible. Case in point: 1st Amendment: freedom of religion. Not only is it freedom to practice religion (free exercise) but freedom from government interference (non-establishment of religion). So not only do I have the right to practice any religion, but no one (government) can force me to believe a certain way. This allows me to feel secure in my beliefs, and security (rather than fear and caution) is one way to encourage love.

For humans to treat one-another with love, does it require the force of law, government imposition, or does it require less law, more freedom, and humans will act towards one another appropriately? Are humans so sinful that government must control us, or are humans sufficiently good that we don’t need that many laws?

What is the answer? Let’s take a tour of the Bacone College Chapel to find the answer. At all four corners of the chapel are words carved into stone. These are from Almon Bacone, Pleasant Porter, Charles Journeycake, and the Book of Micah:

Almon Bacone (Founder of Bacone College):

“A Christian school planted in the midst of a people, becomes one of the most powerful agencies in the work of civilization.”–(in other words, civilization, white society based on the teachings of Jesus, based in love, will spread love.)

Pleasant Porter (Chief of the Creeks):

The vitality of our race still persists. We have not lived for naught. We are the original discoverers of this continent and the conquerors of it from the animal kingdom and on it first taught the arts of peace and war and first planted the institutions of virtue, truth and liberty. The European Nations found us here and were made aware that it was possible for men to exist and subsist here. We have given to the European people on this continent, our thought forces. The best blood of our ancestors has been intermingled with the best statesmen and leading citizens. We have made ourselves an indestructable element in their national history. We have shown that what they believed to be arid and desert places were habitable and capable of sustaining millions of people. We have led the vanguard of civilization in our conflicts with them for tribal existence from ocean to ocean. The race that has rendered this service to the other races of mankind cannot perish utterly.”

Charles Journeycake (Chief of the Delawares)

“We have been broken up and moved six times. We have been despoiled of our property. We thought when we moved across Missouri River and had paid for our home in Kansas we were safe, but in a few years the white man wanted our country. We had good farms, built comfortable houses and big barns. We had schools for our children and churches where we listened to the same gospel the white man listens to. The white man came into our country from Missouri and drove our cattle and horses away and if our people followed them they were killed. We try to forget these things but we could not forget that the white man brought us the blessed gospel, the Christian’s hope. This more than pays for all we have suffered.”

Micah, 6:8:

“He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good: and what doth the Lord require of thee but to do justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with thy God?”

Who am I (and I would be a fool) to disregard what God requires? Jesus was the one man who preached, who represented, Love: the Christian society, to live appropriately, is based on love. Love is the universal, the basis for all things. Jesus loved all, even sinners. All he asks is that we Love. To accept Christ is to accept love.

Only a republic, only a democracy, based on pure and utter love will work, will succeed, will last.

For more on the Baptist missionaries of Oklahoma, see Marking the Jesus Road: Bacone College through the Years, newly republished in January 2026 and available on Amazon at Marking the Jesus Road: Bacone College through the Years: Lawson, Dr. Russell Matthew: 9780977244805: Amazon.com: Books

Posted in books, Christianity, Great Commission | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Constitution and Religion

The framers of the Constitution developed their conceptions of religion and government based on a variety of sources: classical political theory, such as Aristotle; European political theory, such as Machiavelli; English political theory, such as Locke and Hobbes; but also the Christian tradition. For example, Jesus taught to give to Caesar what is due Caesar, and give to God what is due God. Paul taught to obey magistrates as representatives of God’s order. Themes of the New Testament include that God is Justice; that God grants free will and forgiveness; that sin leads to suffering, unhappiness, and pain; that God’s benevolence makes good come from disorder and licentiousness.

The framers of the Constitution wrote in the wake of the disorder caused by the American Revolution. Two thinkers who were part of the intellectual climate during which the Constitution was written were Ebenezer Hazard and Jeremy Belknap. My book, Ebenezer Hazard, Jeremy Belknap, and the American Revolution provides a detailed outline of their respective political philosophies. 

The challenge of the American Revolution was, for Hazard and Belknap, to somehow bring order out of an inherently disorderly situation. Eight years of conflict, chaos, and wanton freedom must be countered by stability and order. How? England represented order, against which the Americans waged a war for liberty. To gain liberty, disorder had to be pursued—that is war. But the disorder of too much liberty has to be constrained by government. The Americans could not have a revolution that was anarchic. They had to have some kind of order, which they accomplished with state governments and the Articles of Confederation. But this situation was one of thirteen sovereign powers attempting to unite the American people in a common government, and disorder and chaos still threatened. Conservatives, fearing disorder, decided to erect a more orderly government, the Constitution. The Constitution involved a reconciliation between freedom and order. 

Jeremy Belknap and Ebenezer Hazard believed that the epoch of revolution, of liberty and the threat of disorder, was akin to the individual’s struggle with sin. God grants the individual free will, just as the Americans wanted to exercise their free will by declaring independence and achieving liberty from England. The problem with free will is that humans are prone to sin, and free will leads to sin, from which, to recover, one must find grace in God’s forgiveness. For God establishes His eternal order of right and wrong, good and evil, virtue and sin, which humans try to conform to, and when they sin, which they inevitably do, they must reach out to God’s mercy for forgiveness. Just as human sin can be constrained, mitigated, by conforming to God’s order, God’s justice, so too human liberty that is too wanton can be constrained, mitigated, by government order, government justice. But can government ever approach the goodness of God, the order of God, the justice of God? The individual must recognize the sovereignty of God—that God’s will alone is the ultimate authority. Likewise, in civil affairs, can the people recognize a sovereign power that alone has the ultimate authority, that we can submit to, when necessary, even give up some of our liberty to, just as we submit to God, and know that we must sometimes give up some of our sinfulness, our free will, to conform to God’s order?

What were examples of this sovereignty in civil affairs that would be akin to God’s sovereignty, and how did it fit the reality of the American Revolution, and America’s search for liberty?

The Mayflower Compact posits the sovereignty of God, next to which is sovereignty of the king. The Declaration of Independence calls upon the protection of Divine Providence, the Supreme Judge of the world. The Articles of Confederation calls upon the Great Governor of the World. The Declaration and Articles imply that there are two sovereign sources, God and the States (and the people in the states). The Constitution does not mention God, rather grants sovereignty to the people (“We the people…”).

The Preamble of the Constitution posits a society of justice and benevolence where the people are sovereign. The Constitution, a secular force, implies an authority like the sovereignty of God; the people are God’s representatives (instead of the king).

The Constitution is a secular document, God is not mentioned, and religion is only addressed, vaguely, in the First Amendment. The debate over individual free will and God’s justice and order, in which the order of society and order of God has hitherto been confused with the sovereignty of God’s representative, whether it be a king or emperor or States, is now the People themselves. The people represent God’s sovereignty by ensuring that they can impose order on their own liberty, impose order on their own free will, to strike a balance between free will (liberty) and order (sovereignty). But no longer is it me and the other, us and them, but now it is me and we, the individual and the collective, merging together the common desire to restrain from disorder (that is, sin) and promote order, but at the same time enjoying as much free will, liberty, as possible.

https://www.routledge.com/Ebenezer-Hazard-Jeremy-Belknap-and-the-American-Revolution/Lawson/p/book/9780367643591

Ebenezer Hazard, Jeremy Belknap and the American Revolution book cover

Posted in American History, Biography, books, Christianity, Government | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Jean Louis Berlandier

I am teaching this semester a course on the History of Science, and am using two of my books: Science in the Ancient World, and Frontier Naturalist: Jean Louis Berlandier and the Exploration of Northern Mexico and Texas. The latter was a product of a good ten or so years of thinking, writing, and research and coming to know, vicariously, the life of Jean Louis Berlandier.

Berlandier was inquisitive, a courageous scientist and explorer, captivated by the inherent beauty of the Texas and Mexican Gulf Coast, intrigued by the incredible natural variety of Texas and Mexico in the 1820s, 1830s, and 1840s. He was also a sensitive observer of the Tejanos, Mestizos, and Americans, as well as the dozens of tribes that were indigenous to, or had immigrated to, Texas and Northern Mexico. Berlandier’s writings and extensive collections of natural and human artifacts were purchased from his widow by Darius Nash Couch, and much of it is preserved by the Smithsonian Institution, Harvard University’s Grey Herbarium, and Yale University’s Beinecke Library.

My writing seeks to recapture the life and experiences of past individuals, and I believe I successfully accomplished this with the French-Swiss-Mexican Jean Louis Berlandier. I first learned of Berlandier about a decade ago when I was working on an encyclopedia of American science . I wanted my encyclopedia to include some Mexican and Spanish scientists, and learned that Berlandier, a native Frenchman who immigrated to Mexico in the 1820s, was one of the best naturalists of his time. He also was an explorer and journalist, artist and cartographer: I was hooked! I discovered that few people had written about Berlandier, that his works exist mostly in manuscript form (in Spanish and French), and that he is largely unknown today–hopefully this has changed some since Frontier Naturalist was published in 2012! I have always enjoyed retracing the lives of explorers and scientists in early America, and my interest grew in trying to learn about, recapture the journeys and writings of, and portray through a narrative history, the life of this fascinating person. It took me several years to research and translate Berlandier’s journals of his travels throughout Texas and Mexico in the 1820s, 1830s, 1840s, and early 1850s. These journals formed the basis for my book, which is largely a narrative account of the many journeys this scientist took in a largely unknown part of America.

I used the same techniques of empathetic research, what I call the dialogue with the past, in my newest book on Captain John Smith: The Sea Mark.

Posted in American History, Biography, books, History of Science, Natural History | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Pious Scientist Jeremy Belknap

Jeremy Belknap, who is featured in three of my books: Ebenezer Hazard, Jeremy Belknap, and the American Revolution, Passaconaway’s Realm, and the American Plutarch, was a pious scientist. He believed that piety is the most important response of the scientist to the work of examining natural and human history; indeed, he believed that the sine qua non of scientific research and methodology is piety and faith. Ironically, then, at a time when reason and the Enlightenment worldview of objectivity and empiricism was touted as the means by which truth could be discovered, progress accomplished, and society’s ills reformed, when Deists such as Tom Paine and Thomas Jefferson challenged the Scripture and argued that the human mind could via science and reason discover the ways of the Creator, who was a benevolent yet passive force in the universe, when therefore the Enlightenment intellectual was arrogantly assuming that knowledge was within his grasp, there was a leading scientist and objective, rational human and natural historian who claimed that all of the aims and goals and methods of the Enlightenment, which he supported, were subject to the human response to the numinous, to the subjective intuition of the religious mind, to the singularly religious attributes of faith and piety.

Jeremy Belknap joined the geographer Jedidiah Morse on a missionary journey in 1796 to the Iroquois of upstate New York. In his journal, Belknap betrayed his interests as a historian and scientist in the natural and human history of New York. He made copious notes on observations of geography, geology, meteorology, agriculture, and observations about different cultures—Dutch, German, Indian. His journal was a scientific journal kept by a missionary to the Indians. His comments on the Iroquois include a recounting of a tale of blood vengeance committed by the Oneida, “which,” he wrote, “strongly marks the little progress made by civilization or Christianity among that people.” “Murders of this kind are agreeable to the Indian principles, though of late they have been rarely practised among the Oneidas.” Belknap recounted the story of Mohawk leader Joseph Brant killing his own son. Brant, a loyalist and officer in the King’s army, who led his people to Grand River in Ontario during the war, was not charged for the crime. Belknap wrote, “Brandt was one of Dr. Wheelock’s scholars,” meaning that he had been educated by the Christian missionary Eleazar Wheelock, who founded Dartmouth College in 1770 for the purpose of educating the indigenous peoples. Belknap had followed closely the progress of Dartmouth College, and was doubtful of Wheelock’s pretentions of success. “Brant can assume the Indian or English manners,” Belknap wrote, “as best suits his conveniency, and keep up his influence with both.” Brant’s murder and others he heard about among the Iroquois caused Belknap to write: “It is high time that these Indians should be made subject to the laws of the State; this must be done if they are to be considered as citizens; if they will still be savages they must retire deeper into the forest.” His conviction about the latter conclusion was strengthened as he continued the journey, finding the rich lands of the Oneida generally uncultivated, and the people living in a “savage state.” What farming that occurred was done by the “strong” and “laborious” women, who worked while their husbands stayed home to smoke their pipes. Belknap and Morse met the aged Oneida named Silversmith “head of the Pagan interest”; they heard that, as Belknap wrote, “the objects of his devotion were the rocks and mountains, which he believed were animated by some invisible Power, which had a superintendency over human affairs. To this invisible Power he addressed his devotions, and depended on it for success in hunting and in war. This had been his religion from his youth, and he had never failed of receiving answers to his prayers.”

On the return journey, at one point Morse was ill, so Belknap spent some time “reading Wheelock’s narratives” and, he wrote, “observing the warm, enthusiastic manner in which the business of converting Indians has been conducted, and the changes which appeared in the conduct of the persons concerned when the ardor abated.” In the formal report of their missionary journey, Belknap and Morse commented on the many baptisms of the Indians, but little true conversion. “The hard treatment,” they wrote, “which the [Oneida] women receive from their husbands, being obliged to labour when they are idle, does not indicate the prevalence of Christian principles.” The two men condemned the intemperance of the Indians, and wrote, “Idleness is the sin that easily besets them, and is the parent of many other vices.” But “labour and industry are the best antidote to intemperance.” Responding to a query from the Society for Propagating the Gospel that “the arts of civilization and industry, when adopted by the Indians, have such an unhappy effect on them,” the two missionaries responded that “an idle . . . mode of life is more likely to have been the cause of their present undistinguishable situation; not to mention various incidents, in the course of Providence, which are not under the control of human power.”

In their report to the Society for Propagating the Gospel, Belknap and Morse provided an extensive apology to explain why it is so difficult for Indians to be civilized and to convert to Christianity. Even in civilized societies people often refuse to give up natural liberties for the sake of creating a good society. Education and polite manners often disgusted Indians and repelled them. Belknap and Morse related an anecdote about an Indian youth who is taken from his tribe and put among whites to be educated, but he is always faced with their comments and actions reinforcing in his mind his difference and inferiority. Yet at the same time he is now different from his own tribe and in their eyes inferior. He is caught between two worlds and cannot quite become part of the former or return to the latter. So he turns to drink in frustration.

This two-world phenomenon reveals that in the transfer from one civilization, one set of fundamental assumptions, morals, and customs, to another, from pagan to Christian and vice-versa, those caught in between often struggle. Any person experiences something of this struggle when they try to do something that challenges their heritage and upbringing. Anxiety and uncertainty are often the consequence, which can be responded to by drink; but as an alternative, Belknap and Morse wrote, the response can also be to Christ. For the Indian the struggle was a transition from a life of fewer restrictions to a life of more restrictions. The former, savage life is free insofar as there is no surrender to higher authority, whether that authority be society, government, morality, or God. So one is free to engage in unrestrained passion and profligacy. However, sin becomes its own master. One can become so ruled by vice, lust, and drink, that this apparent natural freedom is completely lost. So in the psychology of the transition from one culture to another, any culture will offer attributes where peace and contentment can be found, but to be in abeyance from one to another, neither accepting either, resisting both, is to create uncertainty and anxiety. This anxiety was precisely what the Iroquois Indians of New York were experiencing. For some Indians, the transition and resulting anxiety was too great, so rejected. Belknap and Morse used as an example the Natick tribe of Massachusetts, which refused to abandon their old ways in the face of greater white presence and agriculture taking over the forest, and they eventually became almost extinct.

What is more, Belknap and Morse argued that although humans might try to build their society upon the order of nature, sin will always circumvent the attempt, and failure results. A completely natural human society is savage because no self-control is exercised, and disorder reigns as humans pursue the immediate goals of pleasure and power. Complete freedom is inadequate. Individual, private interest circumvents the good of the whole. Humans must exert will over their own nature. Order in society can come from nature, but it must come from human will as well. The Indian refuses to order himself, and the natural life is insufficient. Civilized humans feel the same yearnings as the Indian, but control them through the will based on education and religion. The civilized state restrains passion by self-imposed order. Sin and passion are natural to fallen man; imposition of order and control is learned, artificial.

Belknap and Morse’s concept of civilization and savagery was informed by their scientific understanding of humankind as well as their piety toward God. The civilized state of being is comprised by a society wherein there are standards of decency and decorum and moral behavior informed by Christianity; a society of hard work and devotion to duty; a society of rational thought informed by Christianity and science; a society of piety and humility in the face of divine providence in nature, history, and time. In the History of New-Hampshire, Belknap referred to such a society as one of “social happiness.” In a 1785 Election Sermon he was more to the point. The only way, he wrote, that humans can acquire anything approaching happiness in this life is when they piously seek out and discover God’s hints in natural and human affairs, hints that if implemented in society promise social happiness. Practical science yielding a society based on common sense is a pious response to God’s hints. Further, before Indians can be Christianized they must first be civilized, which means teaching them to discover and implement God’s hints, which requires hard work, cultivation of the soil, building settled communities, and responding to God’s bounty with thanks and worship. The true savages are those of what ever race and creed who do not embrace God’s hints. That whites came to America and, following God’s hints, are continuing to take over the lands and peoples of America, is God’s plan, and one can do nothing else but accept it. Indeed one must accept all of God’s providential work in human history, embrace it, and help civilize and Christianize the Indians as an act of benevolence and humanity.

No wonder it was so difficult to convert and to civilize the Indians, for conversion to Christianity as well as embracing the pastoral, agricultural way of life are long, difficult processes. Time, coming to know God experientially and through books, was required. The response of the missionary must be patience. To convert and civilize native peoples was such a long term process that it would take many years. But, Belknap and Morse believed, Christians had the responsibility to civilize and convert Indians, and not just because the Great Commission required it, but because providential history showed that the Indians were not unlike ancient Europeans who over time moved from savagery to civilization. Belknap and Morse piously understood the movement of human history over time, the movement toward progress and civilization for all peoples. Progress and civilization required thoughtfulness and reflection, which the process of Christian conversion best engendered in people. But more, Elder Scripture is written on the hearts of all people, including the Indians, and it is a form of scripture not requiring literacy. The Indians experienced it daily. Their veneration of nature was wrongheaded but on the right track. Natural theology is insufficient by itself, but when placed next to the written scripture it provides an additional way to understand God.

In short, to the eighteenth-century mind, scientific and religious thought were complementary not contradictory. All avenues of thought based on reason, experience, and observation, even theology, were considered science. Research into nature sheds light on the divine. The most valid response to God the Creator is a pious attempt to understand His Creation, which means natural as well as human history. Piety is engendered by the amazing story of human redemption, which includes, in time, the civilization and conversion of American Indians. Science involves research into the causes and consequences of natural phenomena as well as the causes and consequences of human events. In both of these objects of inquiry, natural and human history, the hand of God is prevalent, and the scientist, as he uncovers the workings of nature and the workings of humankind, cannot help but stand back in awe and reverence. Human understanding is limited of course, by time and by sin. The scientist who examines God’s works can never completely understand them. Lack of knowledge and ignorance are part of man’s sinful nature that requires penitence, acceptance of God’s will, the search for forgiveness of error and sin, and surrender to Christ who is the Word, from whom all things came to be.

https://www.routledge.com/Ebenezer-Hazard-Jeremy-Belknap-and-the-American-Revolution/Lawson/p/book/9780367643591

Posted in books, Christianity, Great Commission | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pious Scientists

Oftentimes, missionaries in America were people of exceptional learning. Almon Bacone, for example, the founder of Bacone College, as a faculty member in the 1880s and 1890s taught an incredible number of subjects: Greek, Latin, rhetoric, English literature, logic, natural science, ancient and modern history, physiology, algebra, geometry, trigonometry.

Bacone used science, broadly interpreted, as a tool in his pious work responding to the Great Commission, as recorded in the Gospels, wherein Christ told His disciples to “Go into all the world and preach the gospel to the whole creation.” Bacone and others like him, such as his student Alexander Posey, were fascinated by God’s Creation, human and natural history. This religious awe of Creation led to thinking in all forms of intellectual endeavor, based on the assumption that in coming to know the perfection of God’s Creation a person at the same time learns about the human creation and the best way for humans to live according to the mandates of their Creator.

The Protestant Christian community of intellectuals, of which Almon Bacone was a part, were trained as scientists and theologians and many practiced this dual character of the pious scientist. The pious scientist engaged in a search to know the secrets of the universe and to reach the limits of human understanding within the context of nature, an overwhelming entity of mystery that dwarfs any one of us, which generates a pious response, demanding reverence, stewardship, humility, dedication, and faith, and which generates a sense of the rational continuity of time and place and awareness of purposeful change, that answers exist to questions, that order not chaos exists, that reason and knowledge are possible. Piety is the response to the realization that we live in a universe of positive, rational, predictable, orderly phenomena. The scientist showed piety through natural theology, the belief in the continuity of and the order in the universe, the acceptance of natural laws, and the confidence that human reason can (and will) discover natural laws. At the same time the pious scientist recognized that nature represents a vast unknown of which humans would always be ignorant of the deepest secrets. As Cotton Mather once proclaimed, “there is not a fly, but that would confute an atheist,” which was as much an admission of his own ignorance before God’s creation as it was a condemnation of agnosticism and atheism. The scientist derived piety from an awareness of ignorance. The humility, lack of hubris, ability to know that one does not know (or quite know), marks the pious thinker, who is expectant, open-minded, in a way awaiting discovery, knowledge, but knows that knowledge is never absolute, always subject to constraints, changes, interpretations. It is this ability to have faith that knowledge exists, which faith drives the seeker to know, that defines the pious scientist. Such knowledge is acquired in time, therefore cannot be absolute, rather is relative, in a process of accumulation. The pious scientist knows that one day he and she will know. In the meantime the pious scientist is on a quest, everyday, to gain knowledge that will only terminate with death.

Jeremy Belknap the 18th century minister, was a pious scientist:

For more on the history of science, see my Science in the Ancient World: From Antiquity to the Middles Ages, published in an affordable paperback on Jan 22, 2026, by Bloomsbury: find it at: https://www.amazon.com/Science-Ancient-World-Antiquity-through/dp/B0FSW74DKZ/ref=books_amazonstores_desktop_mfs_aufs_ap_sc_dsk_0?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_w=6oCC7&content-id=amzn1.sym.299f645c-0a78-440a-94a2-fb482e7cb326&pf_rd_p=299f645c-0a78-440a-94a2-fb482e7cb326&pf_rd_r=142-5197957-8175817&pd_rd_wg=Erb81&pd_rd_r=7cdd0d6a-0a38-49cf-a2ba-a1a0959be396

Posted in American History, Biography, books, Christianity, Great Commission | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment