Jesus of Nazareth

Jesus of Nazareth

Who was Jesus?

               Jesus the son of Joseph and Mary was born in the town of Bethlehem in Judaea around four to six B. C., or according to the Roman dating system of the time, 747 to 749 years since the founding of the city of Rome. Herod the Great ruled the Kingdom of Judaea with the acquiescence and support of the dominant empire of the time, Rome. The emperor Octavian Caesar, Augustus, had been princeps of the Roman Empire for over twenty years, and was in the process of establishing a dynasty that would continue decades after his death. The empire was relatively peaceful: Roman institutions, government, and law provided security and continuity. Roman imperial government was not as harsh as other states, before and after. The benefits of Roman citizenship were sought after, and given due respect. No doubt the humble carpenter and his wife who gave birth to their son in Bethlehem knew little of Roman policies, politics, and traditions. Writers who traced the life of Jesus a half-century after the fact of his birth claimed that Joseph and Mary made their home at Nazareth in Galilee, which was a pastoral, maritime community dominated by a farm economy and the freshwater Sea of Galilee. Fish was the staple of many tables. Fishermen walked to the synagogue along with farmers and craftsmen. Nothing is known about the life of Jesus up to his thirtieth year, save that he and his family had some indications of the significance of his life as they fit his birth into the context of Jewish teaching, history, and tradition.

               The Hebrews had for over a thousand years looked for the appearance of an anointed one, a Messiah (Christos) who would champion their cause, who would free them from suffering and political oppression, who would lead them to a new age wherein the chosen people of Yahweh would find redemption and peace–and power and glory as well. The Messiah was to come in a blaze of glory. According to the Book of Daniel in the Old Testament, the Messiah would provide a temporal and secular manifestation of what all people seek, what people of the ancient world in particular sought–wealth, power, glory, revenge, martial success. Hence did the Jews hunger for the anointed one. They looked for such a person. When Jesus began his teaching, according to later writers such as the author of the Gospel of Mark, he was hesitant to proclaim himself the anointed one. But those around him believed that he was. Indeed, during his ministry of several years in and about Judaea, Galilee, and Samaria, Jesus gained a group of followers as well as the reputation as a helper, healer, and teacher of God’s love and redemption. Jesus rarely spoke in any clear terms about who he thought he was. He allowed others to define him as the Son of God, the Messiah, the Holy One. About his own identity he was silent save one simple, mysterious phrase that according to all the Gospel writers he used in self-definition and proclamation. This was the phrase Son of Man. Jesus’s use of the phrase is as mysterious today as it was two thousand years ago. What he meant by the phrase has confused his followers both then and now. And yet it is in his adopted title, his chosen identity, that we see clearly how to measure our own existence in light of the existence of the anointed one, the Son of Man.

Rome

               When Jesus was born at the end of the first century, B. C., the entire Mediterranean world was controlled by the Roman Empire. The city of Rome was founded, according to tradition and legend, in 753 B. C., and was ruled by foreign (Etruscan) kings until 509 B. C., when the Romans revolted, the king was deposed, and Rome established a representative government, the Republic. The Romans were excellent soldiers: the Roman legion consisted of heavily-armed infantry and supporting cavalry. By 300 B. C. Rome was in control of Italy. Opposing the rise of Roman power, however, were a variety of Mediterranean empires. The empire of Carthage in North Africa controlled the western Mediterranean and opposed Roman expansion west of Italy. The kingdom of Macedon in Greece controlled the Balkans and opposed Roman expansion east. Ptolemaic Egypt was rich and powerful, as was the Seleucid Empire in Western Asia.

               The Roman rise to power in the Mediterranean was rapid and ruthless. The Romans conquered Carthage in a series of wars (Punic Wars), and obliterated the city of Carthage itself by 150 B. C. Shortly thereafter the Roman invaded Greece, conquering Macedon and its king Philip V by 180 B. C. The Seleucid Empire, a large Greek empire that was the remnant of the conquests of Alexander the Great, was controlled by Rome late in the second century, B. C. The varied wars that resulted in Roman power led to the decline of the Roman Republic. Powerful generals assumed illegal powers. The most famous Roman general, Julius Caesar, attempted to establish himself as a king in the mid first century, which began the Civil War in 49 B. C. Caesar’s forces defeated the forces of Pompey by 45 B. C.–Caesar declared himself Dictator. Caesar’s rule was short-lived, however, as he was assassinated in 44 B. C., which began another civil war in which Octavian (Augustus) Caesar would conquer Caesar’s friend and ally Mark Antony and Antony’s lover Cleopatra of Egypt. Octavian marched on and occupied Egypt in 31 B. C.

               During this period of Rome’s rise to power the Hebrews had struggled against a series of different kingdoms and empires attempting to control Palestine. The Apocryphal books of Maccabees describe the Jewish struggle against the Seleucid king Antiochus during the mid second century B. C. Meanwhile Roman power continued to expand into Asia; early in the first century B. C. the Roman general Pompey took control of Palestine and established governors and client-kings to rule the region. One of these rulers, after the death of Pompey and assassination of Caesar, was Antipater, from the region of Idumaea. Antipater’s son Herod succeeded him in 37 B. C. and gained the support of Octavian, who ruled Rome from 31 B. C. to 14 A. D. Herod was an energetic ruler who sought to maintain his personal power at all costs. He supported Judaism and lavished money (gained through ruinous taxation of the people) on his own palaces, in the building of cities (such as Caesarea), and on Jerusalem. He was, like many ancient kings, surrounded by flatterers and family members who sought power.

               Soon after the Resurrection and ever since, for almost two thousand years, some have questioned whether the stories of the New Testament are simply that, stories, without a basis in reality. The Gospels were written between thirty and sixty years after Jesus’s death, when the early church was growing and attempting to attract members and to justify its claims. What better way of justification than to base all claims in the teachings and life of a miracle-worker, the Christ, the Son of God, who willingly died for human sin only to live again three days later before ascending into Heaven? But what if early Christians created Christ for their own purposes? A corollary to the question, “How do we know that Jesus actually lived?” is, of course, how do we know that he was the Messiah and Son of God. In other words, even if he did live, is he really all that the Gospels claim he is?

               To answer in the affirmative that Jesus did in fact live, and that what the Gospels claim about him is true, we must rely on contemporary sources, and examine the impact of Jesus’s life on individuals who lived at the same time. Contemporary sources include, of course, the Gospels, but also the writings of a non-Christian, Flavius Josephus (37-100). And there is no better example of the impact of Christ’s life on a contemporary than the life and writings of Paul of Tarsus, author of the New Testament Epistles.

Gospels

               The four Gospels were written in a form of common, spoken Greek, koine, between 60 and 100 A.D., thirty to seventy years after the death of Jesus. Jesus taught by word of mouth; listeners continued to pass along his words for generations until some sayings and stories were recorded. The Gospel of Mark was not the first in order but, according to modern biblical scholarship, the first written, circa 65 A.D., by John Mark, friend of the disciple Peter and associate of the apostle Paul. German scholars of the nineteenth century believed that the reason Matthew and Luke have similar stories to Mark, often more fully rendered, is because Matthew and Luke relied on Mark as a basis for their Gospels. The stories of Jesus in Matthew and Luke not found in Mark, these German scholars reasoned, were based on another source, or common oral tradition, which they labeled quelle (source), or simply Q.

               Written for a Jewish and Gentile audience, the Gospel of Mark introduces Jesus of Nazareth as the Son of Man, which is how Jesus referred to himself. The mystery of this self-proclamation is further heightened by Jesus’s insistence that those whom he heals should not reveal his true nature as the Christ, the Son of God. The reasons for his reticence to be so identified is as unclear as his preference for the designation of Son of Man. The gospel does not provide the birth stories that are found in Luke and Matthew, and indeed does not provide any biographical information except for a vague account of Jesus’s ministry when he is a mature adult and near the end of his life. The Gospel of Mark provides a disjointed chronological narrative, broken into various episodes in the life of Jesus, related in isolated vignettes. The gospel emphasizes Jesus as healer and as Messiah bringing forth the Kingdom of God.

               The Gospel of Mark is the shortest of the gospels, introducing stories and events that the longer gospels of Matthew and Luke explicate in greater detail. the portrayal of Jesus in the Gospel of Mark is more human than the others, notwithstanding the numerous miracles this gospel (as well as the other three) describe. The Jesus of the Gospel of Mark is not always certain (as when he claims no one, not even himself, knows when the Son of Man will return); he is afraid on the night of his betrayal in the Garden of Gethsemane; he is reluctant for word that he is the Messiah to spread throughout the land; and he tells homely, pastoral parables to illustrate his life, message, and purpose. Examples of the latter include the parable of the sower and the parable of the mustard seed. In the former, Jesus says that “A sower went out to saw. And as he sowed, some seed feel along the path, and the birds came and devoured it. Other seed feel on rocky ground, where it had not much soil, and immediately it sprang up, since it had no depth of soil; and when the sun rose it was scorched, and since it had no root it withered away. Other seed fell among thorns and the thorns grew up and choked it, and it yielded no grain. And other seeds feel into good soil and brought forth grain, growing up and increasing and yielding thirtyfold and sixtyfold and a hundredfold.” The meaning of the parable is that the immediacy of conversion rarely takes root and grows, for true conversion is long and difficult. The parable of the mustard seed

               The Gospel of Mark is written in a simple Greek than can mask its power and profundity. For example, Mark 9: 30-37: In this passage Jesus leads the disciples through Galilee, teaching them that “The Son of man will be delivered into the hands of men, and they will kill him; and when he is killed after three days he will rise.” The disciples, however, are blind to the real purpose of Christ: “they did not understand the saying, and they were afraid to ask him.” Uncertainty and secret fears of his words (rhema), which deal with last things (eschatos), lead them to a typical human response to fear, self-centeredness and narcissism. Coming to Capernaum, a port on the Sea of Galilee, the disciples discuss which one among them is greatest; Jesus castigates them for such vanity, and tells them: “If any one would be first, he must be last of all and servant of all.” Jesus knows that to act against fear and uncertainty one must turn to others, become a servant  (diakonos) to others. The last will be first (protos). Then, “he took a child, and put him in the midst of them; and taking him in his arms, he said to them, “Whoever receives one such child in my name receives me; and whoever receives me, receives not me but him who sent me.” In short, to be like the prototype, Christ, one must embrace fear of last things, of death, and by serving others put aside fear.

               The Gospel of Matthew, written (probably) circa 70 A.D., reputedly by a former tax collector and disciple of Christ identified in Luke and Mark as Levi, was directed toward Jewish Christians, to show Jesus was the Hebrew Messiah, fulfilling Hebrew prophecy. The most noteworthy part of Matthew is the section of moral teaching known as the Beatitudes, based on a series of statements by Jesus during the sermon on the mount wherein he indicated who are the blessed ones. “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of God,” he proclaimed. Jesus teaches that those who realize our poverty in the face of God, who empty themselves before God, are happy. “Blessed are they who mourn, for they will be comforted.” The mournful are those who feel sorrow for themselves, but for others as well. To feel pain and suffering in the human condition is to feel sympathy and empathy, which is the path to love. “Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the land.” The meek, the humble, the one who knows he is no better than another, rather than the proud and arrogant, the one who thinks he is better, will enjoy true happiness. Competition with others so to justify pride and arrogance will never satisfy, will only spur further competition. “Blessed are they who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they will be satisfied.” A person who seeks what is right and true will see righteousness and truth in his own life. “Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy.” To show mercy is to forgive, to feel charity and love toward another; God in turn will show charity and love toward the merciful. “Blessed are the clean of heart, for they will see God.” The person of a pure heart, he who is clean, who eschews sin and evil, will see goodness itself, God. “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God.” He who acts in accordance with God, who is peace and love, becomes the child of God. “Blessed are those who are persecuted for the sake of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of Heaven.” One must fight for God’s ways no matter the consequences. “Blessed are you when they insult you and persecute you and utter every kind of evil against you because of me. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward will be great in heaven.” Blessedness, that is happiness, in short, comes to those who live according to God’s ways rather than the ways of the world.

               The Beatitudes are not as absolute as the more rigid moral requirements that follow in Matthew’s gospel. Unlike the Ten Commandments, the Beatitudes praise certain traits and behaviors rather than condemn specific actions. The verses following the Beatitudes are more severe injunctions of correct behavior. Jesus commands his listeners not only against killing, as in the Ten Commandments, but against anger and slander as well. Not only must a person not commit adultery, but also to refrain from looking at another person in lust, which is akin to adultery. Rather than “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth,” Jesus commands his followers to not resist violence with violence. “If any one strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.” These are moral demands that cannot be met in normal everyday life, just like no one can completely abide by the Ten Commandments. For example, the notion of turning the other cheek requires that the Christian practice complete pacifism, that he does not respond to violence in kind. This is a good principle, and one every person should strive for. But in reality there are times when a person cannot help but defend himself and his family, and he must respond violently. Jesus, no doubt, knew this, but wanted to indicate his interpretation of the Scripture as well as his ethical commandments. However, he knew we would fall short. If we did not fall short, what would be the purpose of the redeemer? Jesus died for our sins, meaning that he took our inevitable sins upon himself to cleanse us. But this does not end sin, for merely by being human we will sin, as the Apostle Paul knew.

               The Gospel of Luke was written circa 70 A.D. by the physician Luke, Paul’s friend, for Gentile Christians. This gospel presents the most full biographical account of Christ’s life. Indeed Luke, who also wrote the Acts of the Apostles, was the first historian of Christianity, narrating the history of Jesus and his followers from Christ’s birth to the activities of Paul throughout the Mediterranean region. Luke’s Gospel, like Matthew and Mark, is often a disjointed series of vignettes. Jesus is the Son of Man who performs miracles and constantly warns that unbelievers and sinners will never see the Kingdom of God. Luke also provides the fullest account of the birth of Jesus, including the story of Joseph and Mary traveling to Bethlehem, finding no room for Mary who soon will give birth, finding a barn and a manger to lay the newborn in, and being visited by shepherds who have heard of the birth from angels. Luke provides the fullest account of the birth of John the Baptist. It is through Luke that we learn the most about the role of Mary in God’s plan of redemption. Luke also provides the only information about Jesus in the years between his birth and ministry, when he is found conversing with scholars of the Jewish Law at the Temple in Jerusalem when he is twelve years old. In Luke, we have some of the most beautiful and most powerful stories and parables in the Gospel literature.

               The first three Gospels of the New Testament are called the Synoptic Gospels because they generally follow the same pattern and provide a similar account of Jesus. The fourth Gospel, John, is quite different. The Gospel of John was written circa 95 A.D. by the disciple whom Jesus loved, John son of Zebedee. Written for Jewish Christians, it is the most mystical of the Gospels, heavily influenced by Greek philosophy. The Gospel of John, unlike the Synoptic Gospels, presents Jesus as the logos, Greek for “word.” The opening lines of the Gospel read: “In the beginning was the word (logos), and the word (logos) was with God, and the word (logos) was God.” Greek philosophers referred to the logos as the spoken truth, a universal concept, a universal truth. John, by referring to Jesus as the logos, claims that Jesus is more than the Son of God and the Messiah: Jesus is eternally present, the light, knowledge itself, God manifested in His word. The Gospel of John presents the first coherent view of the Trinity: God the Father, Jesus the Son, and the Holy Spirit (the paraclete or advocate), of the same substance, the same being, but acting in different ways.

               John’s use of the concept of logos places Christianity firmly in the context of Greek and Roman philosophy. For centuries Greek philosophers had speculated on the character of being, of logos. the Greeks were lovers of grand ideas, and though there were skeptics, and materialists such as the Epicureans, few Greeks doubted that there was some core idea, a spiritual center, a universal and absolute force defined by early philosophers such as Xenophanes as the mind, or the universal soul according to Pythagoras, or to Anaximander of Miletus, the infinite, or to Zeno of Alexandria, the logos. Stoic philosophers conceived of the logos as the “holy spirit” or the “divine fire.”

               Jesus as presented by John is firmly God. He claims as much, as when he says to the Pharisees of Jerusalem (8: 58), “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.” Such is the name of Yahweh (“I am Who I am”–Exodus 4: 14). Indeed throughout the Gospel of John, Jesus claims “I am.” “While I am in the world, I am the light of the world.” (9: 5) “I am the gate for the sheep.” (10: 7) “I am the good shepherd.” (10: 11) “I am the resurrection and the life.” (11: 25) “I am in the Father and the Father in me.” (14: 11) “I am the true vine.” (15: 1) “I am the bread of life.” (6: 35) “I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life.” (14: 6)

Josephus

               One could argue, of course, that as the Gospel writers had a stake in what they were writing about, that no one would believe their words unless they believed that Jesus had lived, that they are inherently biased sources. What is required, then, to provide ironclad evidence of Jesus’s existence, is an unbiased source. Such are the writings of the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus (37-100). Josephus was a Pharisee, perhaps an Essene, a military leader in the uprising against the Romans that occurred in the 60s, and eventually a turncoat who abandoned his countrymen for the Roman cause. He spent the last decades of his life in Rome in retirement, writing books in Latin for a Roman audience, in which he justified Rome’s role in destroying Jerusalem and his own role in abandoning the Jewish cause. He changed his name from Joseph ben Matthias to Flavius Josephus, divorced his wife and married a Roman, and otherwise abandoned his heritage to live a luxurious life in Rome. Josephus was a Jew, perhaps even a pagan, but not a Christian. Hence it is significant that he records information about Jesus. He had no reason to write about Jesus save that the incidents surrounding Jesus’s life were intriguing and fascinating, and as a historian Josephus decided to include them in his history. There are many versions of Josephus’s history preserved in different languages. The Rumanian and Russian edition, translated from Greek, includes accounts of John the Baptist and Jesus. The following description of Jesus reveals that much of what is written in the Gospels is a legitimate account of his life:

                  It was at that time that a man appeared–if ‘man’ is the right word–who had all the attributes of a man but seemed to be something greater. His actions, certainly, were superhuman, for he worked such wonderful and amazing miracles that I for one cannot regard him as a man; yet in view of his likeness to ourselves I cannot regard him as an angel either. Everything that some hidden power enabled him to do he did by an authoritative word. Some people said that their first Lawgiver [Moses] had risen from the dead and had effected many marvelous cures; others thought he was a messenger from heaven. However, in many ways he broke the Law–for instance, he did not observe the Sabbath in the traditional manner. At the same time his conduct was above reproach. He did not need to use his hands: a word sufficed to fulfill his every purpose. Many of the common people flocked after him and followed his teaching. There was a wave of excited expectation that he would enable the Jewish tribes to throw off the Roman yoke. As a rule he was to be found opposite the City on the Mount of Olives, where also he healed the sick. He gathered round him 150 assistants and masses of followers. When they saw his ability to do whatever he wished by a word, they told him that they wanted him to enter the city, destroy the Roman troops, and make himself king; but he took no notice. When the suggestion came to the ears of the Jewish authorities, they met under the chairmanship of the high priest and exclaimed: ‘We are utterly incapable of resisting the Romans; but as the blow is about to fall we’d better go and tell Pilate what we’ve heard, and steer clear of trouble, in case he gets to know from someone else and confiscates our property, puts us to death, and turns our children adrift.’ So they went and told Pilate, who sent troops and butchered many of the common people. He then had the Miracle-worker brought before him, held an inquiry, and expressed the opinion that he was a benefactor, not a criminal or agitator or a would-be king. Then he let him go, as he had cured Pilate’s wife when she was at the point of death. Returning to his usual haunts he resumed his normal work. When the crowds grew bigger than ever, he earned by his actions an incomparable reputation. The exponents of the Law were mad with jealousy, and gave Pilate 30 talents to have him executed. Accepting the bribe, he gave them permission to carry out their wishes themselves. So they seized him and crucified him in defiance of all Jewish tradition.

               Josephus therefore had learned enough about the life of Jesus to know that he someone with a reputation for divine or superhuman qualities; that he performed miracles and was a healer; that he had followers who expected him to overthrow the Roman occupation of Palestine; that the Jewish authorities considered him a liability in their relations with Rome; that he met with Pilate, who found him innocent but ultimately caved into Jewish pressure; that he was crucified.

Nag Hammadi Scrolls

               Another important source giving evidence of the life and teachings of Jesus is the Nag Hammadi Scrolls. These papyrus and parchment scrolls were discovered at Nag Hammadi, Egypt, in 1947. They contain a collection of writings from a sect of Christians heavily influenced by the Greek philosophy of Gnosticism, which assumed that truth involved the search for gnosis, inner knowledge, which is found within each person. Gnostic Christians believed that truth is spiritual rather than bodily, hence the search for God must involve an approach that transcends bodily experiences. Gnostic Christians such as Valentinus did not accept the orthodox interpretation of Christ’s life that included the Incarnation, where God chose to take on human flesh and become man; the Crucifixion, where God chose to suffer and die; and the Resurrection, where God rose again in the flesh. Gnostics believed that flesh was evil, and that Jesus was not a bodily human, rather a spiritual presence, even on the Cross. This interpretation of Christ robbed Christianity of the central tenet that Christ must experience humanity to die for human sins, and was condemned as a heresy by the emerging Catholic Church of the first few centuries, anno domini.

               The Nag Hammadi corpus is a diverse collection of works written between the first and fourth centuries, A. D. It includes new gospels, such as the Gospel of Thomas, Gospel of Philip, and Gospel of Mary; supposed works of other disciples, such as the Apocryphon of James, the Apocryphon of John, the Apocalypse of James, the Apocalypse of Peter, the Letter of Peter to Philip, and the Act of Peter; and other works of Christians, such as the Prayer of the Apostle Paul and the Apocalypse of Paul. Most of these works were known to the early Church, but were branded as heretical by early Church Fathers, and not included in the corpus that made up the New Testament. Modern scholars consider most of them to have been written several centuries after Christ’s death, and reflect the thinking of second and third century Gnostic Christians, rather than the actual writings of the disciples and followers of Christ of the first century. There are, however, a few exceptions. The most important is the Gospel of Thomas

The Gospel of Thomas

               The Gospel of Thomas is a Coptic translation of original Greek, with some indication that the sayings were originally in Aramaic, the spoken language of the Near East, hence of Jesus and His disciples. The gospel is a sayings gospel, that is, there are no biographical details, rather just the sayings of Jesus, most beginning with the statement, “Jesus said…” Modern scholarship places many of the sayings in the first century A. D., hence as old as the original four gospels. Some of the sayings are found in the four gospels, but others are completely new, and apparently authentic–that is, part of an oral tradition of the mid-first century that circulated the sayings of Jesus. The Gospel of Thomas is therefore an extremely important source in our understanding of Jesus and his teachings.

               The gospel opens with the statement: “These are the secret sayings which the living Jesus spoke and which Didymos Judas Thomas wrote down.” Thomas was the disciple known as the twin, in some traditions Jesus’s twin; he was the “doubting” Thomas of the Gospel of John. The Gospel of Thomas confidently declares that “Whoever finds the interpretation of these sayings will not experience death.” The Gospel of Thomas was doubtless included in the Gnostic corpus of the Nag Hammadi Scrolls because it has Gnostic overtones, such as the following: “The kingdom is inside you,” Jesus said, “and it is outside of you. When you come to know yourselves, then you will become known, and you will realize that it is you who are the sons of the living father. But if you will not know yourselves, you dwell in poverty and it is you who are that poverty.” Self-knowledge, Gnosis, is the key, therefore, to the wealth of the Kingdom of Heaven. Many of the statements Jesus makes in the Gospel of Thomas are similar to those of the four Gospels, but others are quite different, such as: “Jesus said, ‘When you see one who was not born of woman, prostrate yourselves on your faces and worship him. That one is your father’.” A Gnostic would not believe in the Virgin birth of Christ. Another Gnostic saying Jesus makes in the Gospel of Thomas is: “I shall give you what no eye has seen and what no ear has heard and what no hand has touched and what has never occurred to the human mind.” Still another: “When you make the two one, and when you make the inside like the outside and the outside like the inside, and the above like the below, and when you make the male and the female one and the same, so that the male not be male nor the female female; . . . then will you enter [Heaven]. The Gospel of Thomas repeats some of the sayings of the Beatitudes, but adds a few new ones, such as: “Blessed is the man who has suffered and found life’; and, “Blessed are the hungry, for the belly of him who desires will be filled.” Echoing the Gospel of John, Jesus says: “It is I who am the light which is above them all. It is I who am the all. From me did the all come forth, and unto me did the all extend.”

For more on Jesus, see my biographical study of Jesus at Metamorphosis: How Jesus of Nazareth Vanquished the Legion of Fear–Hardcover | Ash Hill Publishing

Posted in books, Christianity | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

American Catholics

Understand the role, impact, and lasting legacy that Catholicism has had in North America from European contact to today.

Beginning with North America’s contact with three imperialist powers (Spain, France, and England), this narrative account tells the story of how Catholicism became and continues to be part of the basic religious and cultural fiber of North America. The book follows a narrative chronological and thematic format, focusing on people, events, practices, social and cultural phenomena, and institutions. People discussed include the well-known, such as Christopher Columbus and Junipero Serra, and the not-so-well-known, such as Juniper Berthiaume and Jean Louis Berlandier.

With 33 chapter divided into 7 parts and all drawing on primary sources, this book engages with topics such as the overwhelming violence against Indigenous people and the religion’s role in wars, politics, and modern-day culture.

American Catholics: An Encyclopedic History: Russell M. Lawson: Bloomsbury Academic – Bloomsbury

Posted in American History, books, Christianity, God's Providence, Great Commission | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Christmas Miracle

For Christmas, this novella is a fictional account of one person’s search for God, for love, as he arrives at the final moment of his life. Calvin is a middle aged husband and father dying of cancer. He is spending his last days in a hospice. The book examines his last day of life, Christmas Eve into Christmas Day. Amid the pain and suffering, Calvin experiences a recurring dream in which he is searching for truth, attempting to fill in a scroll with words of truth. In an imaginary dream town, he tries various means to uncover the truth, without success. Finally, in the late afternoon of Christmas Eve, he finds himself standing in line in an alley of the town. He converses with several people–a smoker, a knitter, a professor, and a little bald man. As they wait for the end of the line, they try to figure out what the line is for. Their conversation takes a religious turn, and the professor tries to convince everyone that Christianity is nonsense. He is skeptical and secular. The little bald man tries to counter the professor’s arguments, generally without success. As the line proceeds outside of town into a hilly environment, and as darkness falls and fog envelops them, they cease their conversations. Calvin is alone with his thoughts. He is not sure why he is in the line, where it is taking him. Eventually, at dawn, he comes to a hill on which is a ladder. Unsure why, for what purpose, he scales it anyway, and arrives at a long wooden horizontal post with a hammer and nails. There are notes hammered to the wood. Calvin reads them. They are confessions of error, pain, suffering, and sin–to whom is unclear. Meanwhile Calvin, in the hospice, goes in and out of sleep. He is experiencing horrible pain, and knows he is close to death. The dream intrigues him. As he grows closer and closer to the end, the dream reaches a culmination as well.

The book is available at The Christmas Miracle | Ash Hill Publishing

Posted in books, Christianity | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Anno Domini

Humans have latched onto dating systems and chronologies as the means by which we keep track of ourselves vis a vis others in time. We keep track of where we are in terms of our own passing, our own age, and the passing of our own time, our generation, and the passing of centuries, even millennia. There have been and are many different kinds of dating systems. The one universal dating system upon which governments, business, travel, and education are based is to measure years chronologically according to centuries and millennia. We date according to Common Era (CE) and Before Common Era (BCE) to provide reference of human passing over time. But what do these mean, CE and BCE? Upon what are they based? Where do they derive? The birth of the child Jesus—the incarnation. Time as we measure it today is linked to a religious, even a supernatural, moment.

The birth of God become man, the nativity of the Son of God, the act of the Word becoming flesh, the incarnation of Christ, the Messiah, is the central moment in human history if for no other reason than that the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem two thousand years ago has made such a profound impact on human expression, thought, and institutions. This statement should go without saying, but if it does not, then consider the following most obvious example of the continuing impact of the Incarnation. The year of this writing, 2023, is a numerical symbol for a solar year, the 2023th since some important event, so important an event that clocks, calendars, cell phones, governments, security agencies, world financial institutions, and more, base their systems, their very institutional beings, on an event that happened so long ago. How did this dating system emerge, and around what event? The answer to the former question is long and complex, covering centuries of attempts to erect chronological systems around the event, which was like so many other such events that occur everyday and have occurred everyday for the past thousands of years: the birth of a child.

One might assume that an event so important to world history would have been and is well known and celebrated around the world on its anniversary—and it is. One might assume that such a significant event would likewise be so well known in all of its details that the exact time, place, setting, time, and chronology compared to other events would be well known—but not so. Strangely, arriving at a correct date for the birth of Jesus of Nazareth has long been a perplexing, unsolvable problem. Jesus could have been born during any one of a range of a dozen years two millennia ago. Of these, the least probable year for his birth is the year 1. There exist only two sources, the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke, which provide any information whatsoever about this central event in the history of humankind. Yet the two Gospels cannot be reconciled chronologically. Indeed, the four sources that purport to provide biographical portraits of Jesus–Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John–as a whole provide limited contradictory accounts of his birth. And yet the birth of Jesus of Nazareth is considered the central event in human history by the religion, Christianity, with the most adherents worldwide, and it has for centuries been the basis for the world’s most commonly accepted dating system: the linear system of Ante Christos (BC) and Anno Domini (AD), since euphemistically renamed to Before the Common Era (BCE) and Common Era (CE).

Time is so important to humans individually, collectively, personally, and institutionally. Yet what is known of time? What is it? Theologians, philosophers, and historians for centuries have tried to uncover the true nature, to comprehend, time. Is time an artificial measure, a tool by which humans trace their own existence? Or, does time have an independent existence, a phenomenon separate from human experience? Is time geologic, the earth carving a temporal path from its beginning to its end? Is time dependent upon human awareness?—hence without humans to know and trace it time is meaningless, nonexistent. Is time an absolute, a constant that can be measured with mechanical devices, a certainty that, as Newton believed, has very little fluctuation, hence allows humans the confidence to base our lives upon it? Clocks, chronometers, and calendars help us to safely trace the passing of years, days, months, which gives us meaning, helps us to know ourselves and our world. Or is time relative, as Einstein believed? Einstein argued in the theory of relativity that time depends on movement, that a person who travels at an extremely high rate of speed experiences time different than a person at rest. Since it depends upon the experience of an individual, time is inconstant and fluctuating, governed by outside forces, significant only insofar as it yields for each person a way to gauge personal movement. According to the theory of relativity, one person’s time is not the same as another person’s time. Although time appears to move quickly in the twenty-first century because humans move rapidly, coming and going, and information is quickly exchanged, seemingly in an instant, does this mean an individual perceives time any differently than someone from the past, say in first-century Rome? Does a person’s bodily movement, the movement of the mind, the aging process, change with changing technology, with rapidity of motion? Is it important to know one’s age or date of birth, to know the year, the month, the day, the hour, the minute, the second? What does it mean to regulate institutions, government, the most minute human events, according to the passage of seconds, minutes, and hours? Does an individual experience life differently by knowing the precise time according to satellites, cellular devices, computers, and atomic clocks?

The Gospel of Matthew records the birth of Jesus as occurring toward the end of the reign of Herod the Great, King of Judaea, who died in the year 4 Ante Christos/Before the Common Era. Matthew’s Gospel portrays the world as in need of a savior; then a star appeared, followed by visitors, the magi, coming from the East. Through the magi, according to Matthew, Herod learned of the birth of the Messiah in Bethlehem, which led the desperate king to order the murder of all children in Bethlehem under the age of two years, according to the period during which the child was purportedly born. Matthew’s account has little precision in terms of actual events, placing several isolated episodes together into one not entirely convincing narrative. Matthew wrote in Greek, the language of learning in the Roman Empire, of which Judaea was a part.

The dating systems used at this time in the Roman Empire were Roman and Greek. According to the former, Roman system, Jesus of Nazareth was born about 749-751, a.u.c. (ab urbe condita, from the legendary founding of Rome by Romulus and Remus). According to the Greek dating system, Jesus of Nazareth was born at the end of the 193rd Olympiad or beginning of the 194th Olympiad (an Olympiad having occurred every four years since its founding almost 770 years before)–in short, 6-4, Ante Christos/Before the Common Era.

Luke, who professed at the beginning of his gospel to give his readers an accurate and complete story of the life of Jesus, provided two different accounts of Jesus’s birth that would result in two contradictory dates. Like Matthew, Luke, in chapter one, used episodic accounts, bringing into his narrative the stories of the visits of the angel Gabriel to Zechariah, father of John the Baptist, and Mary mother of Jesus. According to these stories, Jesus was born six months after the birth of John the Baptist, which occurred near the end of the reign of King Herod, which conforms with Matthew’s dating system. Unlike Matthew, however, Luke’s account, in chapters two and three, also provides chronological facts by which to date the birth of Jesus. Luke’s gospel implies simultaneity to several events: the creation of the province of Judaea by the Romans after almost a half century of rule by Herod and Herod Archelaus; Augustus Caesar’s ordering of a census; the subsequent rebellion of Judas of Galilee; and the appointment of Quirinius as Governor of Syria. Luke’s system of dating according to simultaneous public events is as sophisticated as the best Roman historians of the first century. According to Luke, Jesus was born in 760 a.u.c. or two years after the 196th Olympiad (i.e., 6 Anno Domini/Common Era).

In Luke, chapter three, the historian dated the beginning of Jesus’s ministry to several simultaneous public events: the 15th year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, when Pontius Pilate was Procurator of Judaea; Herod Antipas was Tetrarch of Galilee; Philip, son of Herod, was Tetrarch of Ituraea and Trachonitis; Lysanias was Tetrarch of Abilene; and high priests of the Sanhedrin were Annas and his son Caiaphas. Luke also stated in chapter 3, verse 23, that Jesus was about thirty years old when he began his ministry. Had Luke been exact regarding Jesus’s age at this time, then it would be clear that he was born a few years after the death of King Herod, about 1 or 2 Ante Christos/Before the Common Era. Luke’s vague statement in 3:23 does not, however, accord with Matthew, or even with Luke’s earlier statements regarding the incarnation.

Subsequent chronologers who tried to date the birth of Jesus of necessity relied on Matthew and Luke supplemented by the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus. In his Antiquities and History of the Jewish War, Josephus provided confirmation of some of the events and rulers listed in Luke, chapter two. Josephus’ difficulties in dating events is illustrated by his chronology of the Roman destruction of the temple. Rather than relying on the Roman system of ab urbe conditia or the Greek system of Olympiads, Joseph used a Hebrew system according to significant events and the rule of kings.

The problem facing chronologers was, besides the inherent contradictions in the gospels of Matthew and Luke and the lack of an account of Jesus’s birth in the other two gospel writers Mark and John, that ancient historians and scientists disagreed upon which chronological system to use to date events. The great Athenian historian, Thucydides, relied on the reigns of Spartan ephors and Athenian archons to provide dates in his account of the Peloponnesian War. The Greek historian Polybius in his Histories used the more accurate and, from the standpoint of the Greeks, universal dating system of the Olympiads. The Roman historians Livy, writing during the reign of Augustus, and Tacitus, writing about a hundred years later during the reign of Domitian, used, besides the Olympiads, the system of dating events from the founding of the city of Rome (ab urbe conditia). In subsequent centuries, however, Christian writers, unwilling to rely on pagan dating systems, wished for a chronological system based on religious events. Eusebius of Caesarea, writing during the reign of Constantine, added to the pagan dating systems and the chronology of Josephus a hypothetical chronological scheme beginning with the birth of the Patriarch Abraham. Yet three hundred years after the incarnation, Eusebius still struggled to date the birth of Christ.

During Eusebius’ time the Church and Empire, after the conversion of Constantine, were also particularly concerned with dating the Resurrection, that is, Easter. Theologians and chronologers used Greek, Roman, and Hebrew dating systems, until Dionysius Exiguus, in the sixth century, tried to base the reckoning of the dates of Easter not according to the older systems, rather according to a new system based on the greatest event in human history, the incarnation of Christ. He used Luke 3,1 (John the Baptist appeared during the 15th year of the reign of Tiberius, 28-29 AD) combined with Luke 3:23 (Jesus was about 30 years old when he began his ministry), to estimate the year 1 (the first year or the year of our Lord, Anno Domini).

There is also the system of time developed by Aurelius Augustine, which is a method of understanding the temporal significance of the birth of Jesus of Nazareth that eschews reliance upon dating systems both ancient and modern. Augustine realized that the incarnation and resurrection cannot really be understood according to reason and logic, the stuff upon which chronologies and dating systems are based. Augustine developed another way (other than narrative, chronological history) to understand the incarnation and its significance that eschews precise dating.

In Confessions, Augustine provided a model of personal time thatprovides each person with a model of the individual experience of the life and significance of Christ that has little to do with formal chronologies and history, and public events. It depends upon the old Greek idea of the Logos as developed by Philo Judaeus of Alexandria and the Apostle John. Philo wrote of the Logos: God creates “at once, not merely by uttering a command, but by even thinking of it.” And John wrote, “In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God, and the word was God.”

Logos simply exists, all times, but by taking on flesh enters into time, interacts with time, bringing light into time, whereas before there was darkness in time. Darkness, time, yields to lightness, eternity. Ignorance yields to knowledge. Time is darkness because we cannot see what lies ahead. The future is unknown, and the past a memory. The present is a brief momentary anticipation of what might be. But if light enters darkness, if timeless enters time, then the path forward is brightened, made aware to us, lighting the way in the darkness. The future, always dark, is opened to light, and complete ignorance gives way to some knowledge of what will be. Not what might be. Because the night implies ignorance, implies that we are still guessing based on experience. No, now we know what will be thanks to the light.

All cultures have struggled to know the Logos. Polytheistic peoples conceived of a divinity that was inherent in nature, controlling all things, encompassing past, present, and future. The Hebrews identified it as Yahweh. The Greeks as the mind, the infinite, the good—the Logos. Asian philosophy called it the Way, the source, the Brahma. Christianity offers a unique perspective, of a transcendent that acts in time, subtly, upon the self, connecting the self to the transcendent—a direct physical and spiritual connection.

As for me, in my teaching and writing, I prefer to stay with Ante Christos and Anno Domini (not BCE/CE)—for how can time be truly understood without the incarnation, the Logos becoming flesh?

Want to read more: consult my Metamorphosis: How Jesus of Nazareth Vanquished the Legion of Sin, https://ash-hill-publishing.square.site/product/metamorphosis-how-jesus-of-nazareth-vanquished-the-legion-of-fear-hardcover/ETEBDKWQ5QIVJBWDA4T6JD64?si=true

Posted in Christianity | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Jesus Road

In the early 1830s, physician, scientist, and neophyte missionary Jean Louis Berlandier watched as his friend, an unnamed Kickapoo Indian, lay dying. The Kickapoo gave off a fierce appearance in his dress, paint, and bearing; he was a skilled hunter; he had once exacted terrible revenge against his estranged wife and her lover. But the Kickapoo had grown tired of his indigenous religion, which had allowed him to justify murderous vengeance; he had given up those ways where “once offended” by treachery, he believed his soul “to be defiled” and sought “at any cost and at every moment to destroy those who” had injured him. Guilt engendered by a growing knowledge of Christianity and the behavior and teachings of his friend Berlandier convinced the Kickapoo to repent and to embrace. How long he believed in Christ’s redemption before he accepted baptism is not recorded; perhaps he had been coming to the belief for some time; perhaps it occurred when he realized the nearness of death. The Kickapoo had been under Berlandier’s care, indeed had resided in the physician’s house, when Berlandier encouraged his mortally ill friend to be baptized. The Kickapoo consented, and Berlandier sent for a Catholic priest, then watched as his friend “rejoiced at the sight of the priest” who was to administer the sacrament. Berlandier, who was not a proselytizer, recorded what he observed: a former “savage” of the plains had willingly accepted the sacrament that would cleanse his sins and mark him as Christ’s own. Missionaries and other commentators before, during, and after this time tended to explain Indian embracement of Christianity as superficial, even inspired by mercenary reasons. The Kickapoo, however, believed that he had nothing to gain from baptism but his eternal soul. Berlandier observed his dying friend to “invoke the Most High” when the priest sprinkled the holy water upon his head. The invocation was “in his own way,” in his own language and according to the beliefs of his youth, “indicating the sky as His place of residence.” The astonishment and change in belief that the Kickapoo experienced was an act of accommodating new beliefs with the old; the new supplants, but does not eradicate, the teachings of youth and experiences of a lifetime. Like many Christians before and since, the Kickapoo embraced Christianity while not completely abandoning his previous indigenous beliefs.

            Recent scholarship on the Christian experience of indigenous peoples has questioned whether or not conversion is an accurate, sufficiently descriptive concept of what happens when a person puts aside traditional to embrace new beliefs. Conversion implies an ethnocentric view that describes the Christian experience of the Western Tradition—but does it describe the experience of indigenous peoples as well? Scholarly emphasis has been upon the synchronistic experience of indigenous religious change. Indeed, religious change from one belief to another is neither static nor isolated, but partakes of experiences over time and in particular places. At the same time, to focus so minutely on the particular that the universal is abandoned or simply not seen does not advance thought and understanding of human religiosity. In any culture during any time individuals feel an overwhelming need for completion, sense a pull from a transcendent other, what Rudolph Otto called the numinous, which the individual seeks, senses, reaches out for, receives, and accepts.

            Historical accounts of missionary activities in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century North America often provide narratives of indigenous peoples embracing Christian beliefs, usually as recorded by the missionary. The most common are accounts by missionaries who assumed that the convert was little better than a savage who, because of the efforts of the missionary, had embraced Christianity as well as civilization. An example is Jedidiah Morse, a New England missionary to the Iroquois and Algonquians of upstate New York, the Great Lakes Region, and Ontario, who assumed that indigenous peoples lived in a primitive state and needed to be civilized and Christianized. Missionaries who provided an empathetic portrait of conversion with no apparent bias are found less often in historical documents. Many missionaries had genuinely benevolent souls and acted in love toward indigenous people who were friends rather than objects. Jeremy Belknap, who ministered to the Indians of the upper Connecticut valley and upper New York, and who was a colleague with Morse in the Scots Society for Propagating Christian Knowledge, empathized with these people whom he considered to be human, no better and no worse than himself, even if their society, culture, and technology were more primitive.

            More rare are accounts of religious change penned by the indigenous convert or dictated by the convert to an accurate transcriber or translator. Examples include autobiographical accounts of religious change, such as the personal experiences of George Copway, a nineteenth-century Ojibwa who embraced Christianity and became a missionary. Copway, who wrote an account of his experiences in 1847, argued that white missionary work among the Indians was obligatory considering that whites had “dispossessed” the Indians of their lands. Copway, who at a camp meeting in 1830 in Ontario was deeply influenced by the preaching of a missionary, wrote: “I . . . groaned and agonized over my sins. I was so agitated and alarmed that I knew not which way to turn in order to get relief. I was like a wounded bird, fluttering for its life. Presently and suddenly, I saw in my mind, something approaching; it was like a small but brilliant torch; it appeared to pass through the leaves of the trees. My poor body became so enfeebled that I fell; my heart trembled. The small brilliant light came near to me, and fell upon my head, and then ran all over and through me, just as if water had been copiously poured out upon me. I knew not how long I had lain after my fall; but when I recovered, my head was in a puddle of water, in a small ditch. I arose; and O! How happy I was. I felt as light as a feather. I clapped my hands, and exclaimed in English, ‘Glory to Jesus.’ I looked around for my father, and saw him. I told him that I had found ‘Jesus.” He embraced me, and kissed me; I threw myself into his arms. I felt as strong as a lion, yet as humble as a poor Indian boy saved by grace, by grace alone.” Another example was the Ojibwa Peter Jacobs, who after his religious change became a Methodist missionary to indigenous people in the Hudson’s Bay region. Jacobs wrote an autobiographical account of his experiences. In 1824, he wrote, “I was a heathen, and so were all the tribes of Canada West. When I was a lad, I never heard an Indian pray, as Christians pray, to the Great Being. Our people believed in the existence of a Great Being, the Maker of all things; but we thought that God was so very far away, that no human voice could reach Him; and, indeed, we all believed that God did not meddle with the affairs of the children of men.” The Indians did not fear God. They took care of affairs with the tomahawk. Whenever he prayed to the Great Spirit, it went like this: “O God, the Sun, I beseech you to hear my prayer, and to direct my steps through the woods in the direction where the deer is feeding, that I may get near him, shoot him, and kill him, and have something to eat thereby.” After listening to the Methodist missionary William Case, Jacobs realized that “the word of God had now got hold of my heart, but it made me feel very sick in my heart. I went to bed, and I could not sleep, for my thoughts troubled me very much. Then I would pray the words over and over again, and go more and more sick in my heart. I was very sorry that God could not understand my Ojibway. I thought God could only understand English; and when I was praying, tears came spontaneously from my eyes; and I could not understand this, because I had been taught from infancy never to weep. In this misery I passed three or four weeks. I then met with Peter Jones, who was converted a few months before me, and, to my surprise, I heard him return thanks, at meal, in Ojibway. This was quite enough for me. I now saw that God could understand me in my Ojibway, and therefore went far into the woods, and prayed, in the Ojibway tongue, to God, and said, “O God, I was so ignorant and blind, that I did not know that thou couldst understand my Ojibway tongue! Now, O God, I beseech thee to be gracious to me, a sinner! Take away this sickness that I now feel in my heart; for all my sins lay very heavy in my heart! Send now thy Holy Spirit to come work in my heart! Let the blood of Christ be now applied to my heart, that all my sins may depart!” Though I could now pray in this way in my native tongue, yet God did not seem to think it best to hear my prayers at this time, but left me to pass many miserable nights. And I cried out again, “O God, I will not let thee alone! I shall trouble thee with my prayers, till thou bless me!” And at last God heard my prayers, and he took away this heavy sickness of heart; but not till many tears had been shed. And when this sickness was taken away from my heart, then I experienced another feeling, which was joy in the Holy Ghost, which was indeed full of glory. My tongue could not express the joy I then felt. I could say nothing but, ‘Happy, happy!’ When I found this religion of Christ so sweet in the heart of man, I wanted all my people then to know of the great and true God; but they all said, No: that I was wrong; that I had been to the white man’s God, and not the Saviour of the Indians. But I said that God was the Saviour of all the nations of the earth; for I know in my own heart what he has done for me: and what he has done for me, he can do for you. And they began to pray for mercy and the forgiveness of their sins; and they praying in strong faith, many of them were converted; and now at this time there are hundreds that are converted among the North American Indians. I was the first fruits of the Missionary labors in my tribe.” Jacobs referred to another convert, Peter Jones, who also wrote of his experiences of religious change. Jones was influenced by the Anglican missionary Ralph Leeming. He had an initial conversion in 1831, but retained some of his Ojibwa religious beliefs. Three years later, in 1834, he “began to feel very sick in my heart, but I did not make my feelings known. Some of the sermons impressed my mind; I understood a good deal of what was said; I thought the black coats understood all that was in my heart, and that I was the person to whom they were speaking. The burden on my soul began to increase, and my heart said—what must I do to be saved? I saw myself in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity. The more I understood the plan of salvation, the more I was convinced of the truth of the Christian religion, and felt my need of its blessings. In spite of my old Indian heart, tears flowed down my cheeks at the remembrance of my sins.  . . . My convictions became more deep and powerful during the preaching: I wept much; this, however, I endeavoured to conceal by holding down my head behind the shoulders of the people. I felt anxious that no one might see me weeping like an old woman, as all my countrymen say that weeping is a sign of weakness, which is beneath the dignity of an Indian brave. In the afternoon of this day my sorrow and anguish of soul greatly increased, and I felt as if I should sink down into hell for my sins. . . . I was fully convinced that if I did not find mercy from the Lord Jesus, of whom I heard so much, I certainly would be lost for ever.” Finally “at the dawning of the day I was enabled to cast myself wholly on the Lord, and to claim an interest in the atoning blood of my Saviour Jesus Christ, who bore my sins in his own body on the tree; and when I received Him unspeakable joy filled my hear, and I could say, ‘Abba Father.’ The love of God being now shed abroad in my heart, I loved him intensely, and praised Him in the midst of the people. Every thing now appeared to me in a new light, and all the works of God seemed to unite with me in uttering the praises of the Lord. There was a time when I thought that the white man’s God was never intended to be our God; that the white man’s religion was never intended to be the red man’s religion; that the Great Spirit gave us our way of worship, and that it would be wrong to put away that mode of worship and take to the white man’s mode of worship. But I and my people now found that there is but one true religion, and that the true religion is the religion of the Bible. Christianity has found us, and has lifted us up out of a horrible pit, and out of the miry clay; it has placed our feet upon a rock; it has established our goings, and has put a new song into our mouths,and ever praise unto our God.”

            These two types of conversion narratives, the more common accounts told by the missionary and the more rare accounts told by the Indian convert, are found among the hitherto unexploited manuscripts of Southern Baptist missionaries found in the archives of the American Indian Collection here at Bacone College. This collection illustrates the problems Indians of particularly western Oklahoma had in adapting to white culture and federal land allotment laws. Baptist missionaries who kept extensive diaries of their interaction with Indians, sent and received correspondence with individual Indians, and submitted detailed reports to missionary organizations, consistently recorded the chagrin, anger, and depression of indigenous individuals who were trying to conform to the beliefs, institutions, and laws of white civilization while being tugged in the different direction of their tribal past. Baptist missionaries reported on the poverty, malnutrition, sicknesses, and passivity brought about by the new way of life of the Indians that afflicted the physical and emotional well-being of the tribes. Were such social and economic problems the stimuli for seeking and questioning that resulted in religious change to Christianity? How exactly did an indigenous person come to renounce traditional tribal beliefs to embrace the religion of white missionaries? What individual experiences of loss and suffering, or joy and understanding, resulted in the desire for baptism? How did conversion impact the individual’s sense of self? What was the Indian conception of sin and redemption?

            One particularly industrious missionary, Robert Hamilton, was tireless in his proselytizing to the Indians and in writing accounts of religious change in his diary and letters. Hamilton was a missionary of the American Baptist Home Mission Society, active in western Oklahoma, engaging in particular the Cheyenne and Arapaho Indians, from the 1890s to the 1920s. Hamilton was part of a missionary movement into Indian Territory by Catholics, Methodists, Baptists, Quakers, Anglicans, and other Christians during the latter half of the nineteenth century and first decades of the twentieth century. Like Christian proselytizers during the preceding centuries in America and Europe, these missionaries considered civilization and Christianity to be one in the same. Missionaries generally adopted a patronizing, condescending attitude toward indigenous people at the same time that they exhibited outstanding energy and bravery in the face of overwhelming despair, poverty, conflict, and violence.

            Hamilton, who had been ordained a Baptist missionary in 1892, was a man of tremendous drive and devotion, energy and patience, curiosity and courage. He, like other missionaries in Oklahoma before and after statehood, cared for the indigenous people, whom he considered to be like children; he was their missionary father, and indeed the Indians themselves adopted the designations of “children” and “father” when addressing him. Hamilton understood that “the Indians are by nature religious, mystical, ritualistic, reverent,” as he wrote in The Gospel Among the Red Man, a partially autobiographical account of Baptist missionary activities in nineteenth- and early twentieth-century America. “It is one of the evidences of the divine nature of the gospel, and of the efficiency of the Holy Spirit to ‘guide into all truth,’ that the missionary to a primitive people, with an unskilled interpreter, can get the message to them, and the resultant surprising grasp they have of divine truth.” In the manuscript account, Sketch of Work Among Cheyennes and Arapahos, found in Bacone’s American Indian Collection, Hamilton narrated in third person the scene when in 1892 he began to meet with the Cheyennes: “These Indians had only nineteen years before quit the warpath, and were living in the midst of a people, who if they had understood them, might have been a great blessing and help to them, but who viewed them with suspicion, and only visited their camps out of curiosity or to trade with them. For these reasons, they continued to live apart from their white neighbors, practicing the most disgusting of heathen customs in the name of religion. Mr. Hamilton attended an Indian burial, at which a woman cut gashes in her arms and legs for the dead, until the blood ran down to the ground. He saw women, who in their grief for their children, had cut off a joint of their fingers one after another until their hands were but stubs.” More astonishing was the Sun Dance ceremony “at which twenty men stripped of all their clothing, danced continuously for three days and nights without food or water. . . . Others had places cut in their breasts, and a skewer put through under a muscle, and this tied to a rope which was attached to a central pole of the dance lodge. Throwing their weight upon the rope, they would dance until the muscles were torn out.” He also witnessed the Ghost Dance, “where all night long, they formed a large circle, going round and round keeping step to the weird, plaintive music as they sang their Messianic songs. He saw a woman go inside the circle and stand for more than an hour with her hands stretched out toward the north, praying most fervently, while the tears ran down her face, pleading for the coming of the Indian Messiah. Her tone and posture expressed the most intense longing. Finally exhausted, she fell in a swoon.”

            Into this pagan environment Hamilton came preaching the Gospel, comparing himself to the Apostle Paul, who likewise brought the teachings of Christianity to a similarly polytheistic and animistic people. Although Hamilton was vain and full of himself, he nevertheless believed wholeheartedly in the Great Commission given by Christ to His disciples. Delivering the Gospel was the sole object to him, and he and his family endured privation and the environmental extremes of western Oklahoma to succeed in this self-appointed goal. The Indians of Oklahoma, like the missionaries that came among them, thought of life as a journey down a well-traveled road, as it were. The Indians knew of many roads to religious enlightenment: the peyote road, the traditional tribal road, and the “Jesus Road.” Frequently they were called upon by missionaries and their own people to make a choice among the available roads. The Cheyennes, Hamilton wrote in the manuscript, Recommendations as to the Cheyenne Field, “in the beginning received the missionaries and their message more readily, and came into the Jesus Road more quickly than any of the other tribes.” The Jesus Road, of course, was fraught with peril to the mind and soul; it was a terribly hard road to follow, and many times the Indian man or woman slipped, unable or unwilling to regain the Jesus Road, rather returning to the road of their ancestors.

            Hamilton provided many examples of this conflict and confusion over the correct path to happiness and redemption. He heard firsthand accounts from Indian men and women, a few of whom could speak English; for others, Hamilton relied on interpreters, such as the Cheyennes Philip Cook and Moore Vanhorn, the latter of whom was an early convert and enthusiastic Christian, despite having suffered many wrongs in his youth at the hands of white soldiers. In the manuscript pamphlet Christmas with the Cheyennes and Arapahoes, Hamilton described the anguish of two women, who had been through much sorrow because of personal loss of family, including their children: “One who had lost her son said that when he died, she had been tempted to throw away the Jesus Road, and take up again her old heathen religion, but that now she could see that it was better to trust in Jesus, and that she could see that His way was right, she asked the church to forgive her for her sinful thoughts, and promised to walk in the ‘Road’ more carefully.” In the manuscript Sketch of Work Among the Cheyennes and Arapahoes, Hamilton described the personal experience of “one old man,” who “told the missionary that in the olden times it was thought an honorable thing to steal from those who were not their friends, and the man who could steal the most horses and cattle, and thus make the best feasts and presents to his people, had the greatest respect. . . . How Jesus had changed his heart from that way of doing[!] Now he had learned to love his enemies, and to do good to all men, and his life bears out his testimony.” In the same manuscript, Hamilton described how some Cheyennes, “who started in the way ‘went back and walked no more with Him’,” and began to persecute those who stayed on the Jesus Road. Such antagonists rejected Christians who were to join a delegation of the tribe going to Washington because they considered the Christian Cheyenne to be too close to the white man, and therefore influenced in the wrong way by Christianity. Moreover, “Christians were told by the Ghost Dance prophets that when the Indian Messiah came and restored the Indians and the buffalo, that all the Indians, who were found in the white man’s religion, would be destroyed with the white people.” Even so, some Ghost Dancers, such as the Arapaho, Hail, in time rejected their beliefs to follow the Jesus Road. The Plains Indian “medicine man,” however, graced with the knowledge of the mystical selection of himself to influence the powers of nature, was less inclined to renounce his pagan beliefs, and was the most formidable opponent of Indian converts. Hamilton recorded the case of a Cheyenne “medicine man” who went so far as to hex a Christian Indian couple: “this medicine man had an arrow, called the arrow of jealousy or hate. When dipped in a certain preparation known only to the fraternity, and shot in the direction of his victim, though miles away, the substance would search him out, and his destruction was certain.” Hamilton rode miles to find the couple, then told them that the medicine man’s threats were the work of Satan (Eahwo), and believers in Christ could put off Satan. “After prayer they were able to cast off the delusion, and peace of mind was restored.”

            Hamilton recounted other examples of religious change among the Cheyennes of Oklahoma. One “old man . . . on being received for baptism, related the following touching incident. ‘The first religious act that impressed itself on my childish mind [the old man recounted], was when a small boy on my mother’s back. At that time my mother made an offering of two buffalo robes to the Great Spirit, and prayed for me, asking that I might live and grow up to be a good man. Later when I was a young man, I met a white man with a kind face and a soft voice, who told me that I ought to love and worship Jesus. He gave me this”–the old man drew “from his breast a crucifix, which he wore next his skin, under his shirt, attached to a string about his neck”–“and told me always to keep it. I have worn it over my heart ever since. I do not pray to it, but have kept it to remind me of the good man and his words. When the missionaries came to our reservation, I was glad to learn that they knew about this same Jesus. I never miss an opportunity to hear them tell about Him, and I was glad when I learned that I could be His friend and follower’.” At a meeting of Christian testimony among the Cheyenne, among other leaders was Chief Iron Shirt, who rose to speak, saying: “I feel as though we all being to uncover our heads, see what the Great Father has done for us. I want to thank you chiefs for the good talks you have made to the people, it makes my heart feel glad. This is all I wish to say as my heart is so full of joy I can scarcely speak.”

            The missionaries of western Oklahoma such as Robert Hamilton helped the Indians form an association of converts, called the Blanket Indian Association. They met annually in June during the first years of the twentieth century. At one meeting, held on the land of the Kiowa chief Lone Wolf near the town of Hobart, indigenous peoples of several tribes—the Kiowa, Comanche, Cheyenne, Arapaho, Osage, and Navajo—met along with Baptist missionaries for a day of testimonial. On this day former Kiowa warriors, leaders of armed bands of men who had raided white settlements and attacked military installations in Texas and Indian Territory, but who had come to embrace peace, spoke of their commitment to the Jesus Road. One of the most notorious of the Kiowa warriors, Big Tree, proclaimed: “I express my gratitude to the Father above for knowing that the Lord Jesus is here. The Almighty created the earth and no part of it has been changed by any other power. God planted his word and work and it has been going on until it reached us. At last it reached me personally. All the Kiowas know what I was—bad—but now I have eated God’s food and been filled. Thirty years ago I was arrested and sent to prison I was so wicked. Lived that way until the Bible came before my face. I didn’t go round or back, but went up to it. My wife first baptised, I follow her, so must you . . . follow missionary teaching, all good. Religion is like throwing away an old garment and getting a new clean garment. I want you head-men to start in this road, it is a good road for all of you; it is the only road which will lead you to the best place we all can think of. Lone Wolf is our only chief, he is a good work-horse, but can’t pull alone, we all must help him; if we would all do this, it would be like traveling with a fast team on a good road. Now this is for the Comanches; tell your leading men to leave off their evil ways and walk in the Jesus road, and then we will get their followers. Today speak out and tell what you will do. Kiowas pushing and fighting every day and we are getting on. The Kiowas are like an engine to a train, it go first and pull, so we start in good, we help you all we can.” One Comanche named Ninsie told his brothers and sisters: “If you want to take the road straight, put away all bad roads. Our brother Jesus is strong, he is very loving, but if Jesus and God pull you out of the fire, and you hold some of it in your hand, they can’t help you.” Lone Wolf himself, who grew up hearing about his father and grandfather’s violent raids on farms and supply trains, spoke during another meeting of the Indian Blanket Association; his comments were recorded by one of the missionaries: “Some time ago [Lone Wolf said] I went up to visit the unfriendly Osages. I found them doing all the old time things. One of their leaders is here, and I want him to know I am very sorry to see them in the old time roads. (He said this with his eyes full of tears.) The white people see me and think I am educated. My father and my grandfather taught me the warpath, and I never had a chance to learn in school. Just as the children will learn the old roads, if not taught. . . . My father should have taught me, but he did not know the Jesus road. I am man enough to know that it is a good road, and take it.”

            One of the most dramatic testimonials given at a meeting of the Blanket Indian Association was by another Kiowa convert, Sanco. “He said,” in the words of one of his hearers, that the experience of embracing Christianity and coming to know the Gospel was “like a stream of living water without sticks or stones or mud in it, ever-flowing, clear as crystal, free to all.” He added: “before the missionaries came they knew nothing about God; the Indians lived in the dark; their minds were covered just like a veil over the face, but now they can see clearly.”

            The accounts of religious change among the Plains Indians of western Oklahoma translated by Indian interpreters and transcribed and recorded by Robert Hamilton were, notwithstanding the time, place, language and events, similar in evocation of feeling and sincerity of mind to the accounts of other religious feelers and thinkers who had their sensations, thoughts, words, and deeds translated and recorded by others. Was the experience of religious change of the Kiowa Sanco any different from the dazzling light that blinded Paul of Tarsus; the child’s voice that responded to Saint Augustine’s agonizing question; the austere, universal presence of the One that so captivated Plotinus and his disciples Porphyry and Julian; the oneness that Siddhartha Gautama experienced in the rushing water of  the river of life; or the fear and awe that Moses knew when standing on holy ground before Yahweh? Common in most of the world’s great testimonies of religious change is the question of who and what exists, followed by the search for being or substance outside of yet connected to oneself, which leads to the discovery of the answer, change in belief and behavior, and finally, acceptance of what is.

            Christianity as an experience of religious change has been an ecumenical force in world history because the religious seeker finds in the scriptures, teachings, traditions, music, liturgy, and the experience of the holy their own questions and answers and their own search and discovery notwithstanding the place or time. The Plains Indians of western Oklahoma discovered in the words of the missionary explanations for human behavior, for mistakes and doubts, for unhappiness and suffering. Even the most fierce warriors sought to be embraced in overwhelming love. The closest experiences to such love that tribal beliefs offered were the promises of happiness in the next life, or the benevolence of the Great Spirit, or the means by which nature nourished, clothed, and sheltered them. The Kiowa Sanco adapted the natural theology inherent in Christianity to his own experiences of delight and satisfaction when finding a pure stream of bright, crystal water, or when coming from out of the darkness of a spring thunderstorm into the broad horizon of the plains covered by the ubiquitous rays of the sun. Not only did Christianity emphasize the importance of natural history in the scheme of redemption, but one’s personal physical and spiritual experiences were known to God, who watched to see whether or not these peripatetic people would keep to the Jesus Road, eschewing all other roads as being distractions of ignorance, hubris, and idleness.

            Baptist missionaries to the Cheyenne, Arapaho, Kiowa, and other western Oklahoma tribes were struck by how eager the indigenous people were to learn of this new religious road that they could take out of the shadows of darkness and doubt into the light of understanding. These religious converts understood what Jesus meant when he told Nicodemus that one must be born again from the mother’s womb. There was no other way, no other road. As a writer the the Baptist Mission Monthly put it:“The evidence of a genuine work of grace in the hearts of these children of the plains are so marked and varied that no one can doubt the reality of their conversion”–or, should we say, the reality of their change from one religious belief that had its own inherent validity to another belief that offered similar conceptions of salvation and redemption, of a universal deity that defied understanding, of rituals of blessing and healing, but which offered something more, a clear path undertaken originally by a man whom the Indians knew simply as Jesus. By forging a road through life and time amid distractions, temptations, suffering, and death, Jesus showed, by means of his example and by the examples of his missionaries, that his road was one for all people. Christian Indians believed that by taking the Jesus Road they shared Jesus’s experience, even if they did live in the arid plains of Indian Territory, hunting the dwindling numbers of beasts and living in mud huts or skin dwellings, impoverished but proud, willing to humble themselves to others, to the Other, for the sake of love.

For more on Jean Louis Berlandier, see https://author.amazon.com/books/editionsMaster?marketplace=ATVPDKIKX0DER&titleset=B009I4EXUW

For more on the Baptist missionaries of Oklahoma, see Marking the Jesus Road: Bacone College through the Years, newly republished in January 2026 and available at Marking the Jesus Road: Bacone College through the Years | Ash Hill Publishing

Posted in Christianity, Great Commission | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Southern Hill Country Mentality

Reflections on the people of the American South after the Civil War into the 20th and 21st centuries as they confronted the perils of modernization.

The Southern hill country personality type is a reticence towards others, even a reticence toward life, a suspicion about others, really a suspicion about everything, being afraid to commit, being afraid to take action, waiting, accepting—accepting not so much God, awaiting the will of God, as accepting because of unwillingness to act, to take a chance. And so life can pass by and one sits and waits, stifled by inaction, stifled by indecision, until finally something forces movement. Movement may be caused by hunger, or fear, some outside force that impels the person to do what he might not otherwise have done. The consequent movement, action, might be absurd, completely out of character, yet circumstances have brought about this action, this movement, and the person goes blindly along, not sure, waiting even while moving, passive even while in the process of acting, faithless even while seemingly throwing all aside in an act of blind faith.

Emotions, likewise, are restricted, because one is unsure how to express them. How does one express love toward another when one is unsure, and reticence is the typical response to everything in life. How can one feel excitement, feel love, feel wonder, feel happiness, in an uncertain world where inaction, waiting, watching, seems the most comfortable approach to life? Rocking in the chair on the porch, waiting—for what? For nothing really, just waiting. Perhaps just waiting for death, waiting for everything to finally come to an end. Waiting for the boredom to end. Waiting for the failure to end. Waiting to be released from the stifling inaction and uncertainty and hopelessness and faithlessness.

The Southern hill country personality is outwardly pious, but inwardly barren. Outwardly such people belong to a church, believe in God, say the proper grace at meals, sing the proper hymns, but without emotion, without feeling, because religion is something not to express emotion over; to express love for God is just as uncomfortable as to express love for another, a child, a relative, a parent. It is embarrassing.  

Thank God for radio and television, by which one can submerge inaction and lack of confidence and the endless waiting for who knows what into a fantasy world of action, of love, of certitude, of confidence, of knowing exactly what to do, of taking life and directing it according to one’s will. How relieving to be able to watch a program, watch others, who are doing what you are unable, unwilling, to do, but you can watch along as they do it, and feel the satisfaction of a life well lived even if it is not your own.

Such crutches are everywhere, to help one limp along in life. If not television, if not the internet, then booze, or pills, or gambling, or something that takes one’s mind away from what is, to focus on what could be, what might be, and so lose oneself in a stupor, a fantasy world where one is exactly what one is not, where one is a great actor, a great mover, a great lover, a wealthy dynamic mover and shaker, a confident person wrestling with life and winning the match time and again.

What happens to you if all of a sudden chance (or destiny) steps in and wrestles  you away from such a life, and you are brought into an awareness of something completely different, a different approach to life, whether it be due to the northern urban personality or some sort of personality in which the fire has been lit, and there is no embarrassment, and a person acts, sometimes foolishly, sometimes in failure, but acts just the same. What is it to put aside inaction to grasp an opportunity and do it? How can the southern hill personality abide by such a notion? Perhaps there becomes a contest of different personalities, different approaches to life, and a person is caught in between, and the personality conflict rages within, the genes of the past confronting the newness of the present, and the split personality results in internal chaos. North and south meet, action and inaction, arrogance and humility, certainty and uncertainty, willingness and unwillingness, and the split personality is torn in so many directions, between choice and non-choice, action and inaction, moving and waiting, doing and watching, accepting life as opportunity or accepting life as struggle.

How can life be both opportunity and struggle, action and inaction, doing and waiting, getting up and sitting down, embracing and distancing, feeling emotion and fearing emotion, loving but being embarrassed by love?

Northern Yankees and Southern hill country people: two different ways at looking at life. One is more accepting, but still has the same fears and trepidations as others, but masks the fears in the formalities and structures of urbanized living—the associations or gessellschaft of modern society. The other is suspicious of such formalities, befitting a more rural people; the fears and trepidations of life are often dealt with not by masking them in formalities, rather by submerging them in the informalities of a more community existence: plain speaking, suspicion of others outside of one’s typical familiarity, a rough appearance to the world to show “ain’t scared–even if you are.

More more, see my book The Lawsons of the American Southern Hill Country: https://ash-hill-publishing.square.site/product/the-lawsons-of-the-american-southern-hill-country/GFKNUWJLOD4IW62K3NWF4WOC?si=true

Posted in American History | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Dorothy Day and The Catholic Worker

Dorothy Day was a lay missionary. She was not a member of a religious order (although she did become a Benedictine oblate), rather she was a convert to Catholicism who completely embraced the religion to guide her everyday existence according to the Church calendar, liturgy, prayers, and Mass. She believed wholeheartedly in Jesus’ proclamation, according to Luke, that “Blessed are the poor.” She rejected the dominant social/economic philosophies of her time—Socialism, Communism, Capitalism—embracing a philosophy—Personalism—that, she believed, best matched the human with her Maker.

Born to a lower middle-class family in Brooklyn, her father was a journalist who moved his family around as he found different jobs in Oakland and Chicago. Dorothy was baptized and confirmed in the Episcopal church. As a teenager she read the Bible and developed a firm foundation of religious faith. But when she attended the University of Illinois, she began to question her religious foundation. She gravitated toward the radical political philosophies in America during World War I and became an anti-war activist and quasi-atheist. She identified herself as a Socialist, writing for Socialist periodicals, following in her father’s footsteps as a journalist. Arrested for protesting in Washington, D. C. for women’s suffrage, she spent a short time in Occoquan prison, becoming familiar with the guidance and solace of the Psalms. But ultimately her radical philosophy turned her away from Christianity. But she could not turn away from God’s ultimate plan.

Living in New York she slowly became attracted to the Catholic church. Dorothy had a variety of love affairs and several marriages; she even experienced the tragedy of aborting a child. In the mid-1920s she was in a common law marriage with Forster Batterham when she became pregnant; he did not want the child, but she did, naming her Tamar. Having the baby inspired in Dorothy religious feelings, and she wanted the child baptized in the Catholic Church. Dorothy soon followed. The Catholic Church, she realized, was the church of the poor, which drew her to it. Dorothy began to be inspired by the New Testament, St. Augustine, St. Teresa de Avila, and in time, St. Therese of Lisieux. She recounts her journey toward converting to Catholicism in her autobiography, The Long Loneliness.

Dorothy met Peter Maurin, a lay member of the De La Salle Brothers and a philosopher on behalf of the European peasantry, in New York in 1932 during the height of the Great Depression. They jointly decided to publish a paper. The Catholic Worker. The first issue appeared in May, 1933. Dorothy and Peter also began to sponsor places for the poor to go for food and shelter, Houses of Hospitality, and soon, farming communes.

During the 1930s Catholicism became second nature to her; she experienced the mystical body of Christ, living her faith wholeheartedly, every day, saying the rosary and daily office. She gravitated toward the liturgy and divine office of the Benedictines, embracing Benedictine hospitality. She was also fascinated by the Franciscans, and imitated them in her view of voluntary poverty, pacificism, and mercy toward others. She also studied Ignatius Loyola and his Spiritual Exercises.

Dorothy became highly critical of capitalism and socialism, choosing instead the philosophy of distributism; the broad gap between the rich and poor disturbed her, and she wanted to see more people able to own their own property. She also embraced the philosophy of personalism, defined as, as she wrote in a 1936 issue of the Catholic Worker:

“We are working for the Communitarian revolution to oppose both the rugged individualism of the capitalist era and the collectivism of the Communist revolution. We are working for the Personalist revolution because we believe in the dignity of man, the temple of the Holy Ghost, so beloved by God that He sent His son to take upon Himself our sins and die an ignominious and disgraceful death for us. We are Personalists because we believe that man, a person, a creature of body and soul, is greater than the State, of which as an individual he is a part. We are Personalists because we oppose the vesting of all authority in the hands of the state instead of in the hands of Christ the King. We are Personalists because we believe in free will, and not in the economic determinism of the Communist philosophy.” (“Dorothy Day and the Catholic Worker Movement,” Mark and Louise Zwick, p 22, in Dorothy Day, On Pilgrimage (Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdsmans Publishing Company, 1999).)

In short, Dorothy’s personal philosophy, reflected in her abundant writings, involved human dignity, free will, obedience to God, working for God, subjecting oneself to God’s will, availability of property for all, and adequate wages for each individual to live a life in conformity to God’s will.

She spoke out against society’s exploitation of the poor, governments spending money on arms and war, advertising that tries to fool the poor into seeking what they don’t need—the sin of concupiscence—and employers refusing to pay adequate wages to the poor for his/her work. For Dorothy, one should live one’s life according to the teachings of the Sermon on the Mount. She also believed in Holy Poverty, giving what one possesses to others, as found in Matthew 25, 31-46: “For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.”

Dorothy anticipated Vatican II wishing for the liturgy to be brought to the people, to conform to their needs. She rejoiced in the reforms of Vatican II, wanting Mass to be less artificial, more natural, not conforming to the wealthy, rather conforming to the poor.

She supported worker’s causes, strikes, unions like the United Farm Workers, she opposed child labor, she opposed environmental destruction, she was worried that agribusiness would omit the poor farmers and farm workers. In some sense Dorothy opposed the dangers of economic and social modernization.

She was pacifistic even during World War II, which put her on the FBI watch list. She was opposed to the Vietnam War. Many Catholic Workers burned their draft cards. She believed in taking Christ’s words in the Sermon on Mount, to turn the other cheek, literally. War corrupts youth, she believed, as well as soldiers, helping to cause the horrors of the 1960s, such as the sexual revolution and the widespread experimentation with drug use. War and conscription, she argued, exploits the poor.

Dorothy was a prolific writer, penning not only her many articles and opinion pieces in The Catholic Worker, but a variety of books: On Pilgrimage, a journal of the year 1948 living on a farm in West Virginia with her daughter Tamar and her husband David Hennessey; The Long Loneliness, her autobiography (1952); Loaves and Fishes (1963), about the Catholic Workers Movement; Thérèse, a biography of Thérèse of Lisieux (1960); The Eleventh Virgin, fiction from 1924; Little by Little: The Selected Writings of Dorothy Day (1983).

Dorothy identified the woman’s typical daily life with the life of dedication to Jesus, to a life in conformity of living in the shadow of the Cross.

Dorothy is an example of a Catholic lay missionary, a person who dedicates her life to the Great Commission, spreading the word and love of God to others, strangers, sacrificing themselves to ensure that God’s kingdom triumphs over evil, secularism, and disbelief. She was famous, of course, but there have been many others just like her who have spent their lives in relative anonymity working on behalf of Jesus. Their work often goes unobserved—but not completely. As Paul wrote in his letter to the Philippians, 2:13: “For it is God who works in you to will and to act on behalf of His good purpose.”

A version of this essay appeared in Catholic Exchange

For more, see American Catholics: An Encyclopedic History, Bloomsbury Publishing: https://www.amazon.com/American-Catholics-Encyclopedic-Russell-Lawson/dp/B0FPDCD57G/ref=books_amazonstores_desktop_mfs_aufs_ap_sc_dsk_1?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_w=amWGR&content-id=amzn1.sym.6d92b4c0-97d6-4063-b66e-20890dfbd616&pf_rd_p=6d92b4c0-97d6-4063-b66e-20890dfbd616&pf_rd_r=142-5197957-8175817&pd_rd_wg=7BluF&pd_rd_r=ff793b35-a49e-4f38-9f31-f263eec7cbec

Posted in Biography, Christianity, Great Commission | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fanny Allen (1784-1819): From Vermont to the Religious Hospitallers of St. Joseph

Fanny Allen’s commitment to the Great Commission was not flashy, the stuff of grand tales of perseverance, suffering, and martyrdom—more the everyday, the challenges to faith of family and friends, the renewed commitment time and again, the daily putting on of the Cross to go out among the suffering and the sick to heal them, if not physically, then spiritually.

            Fanny Allen, born to revolutionary war hero Ethan Allen and his second wife Francis Montresor Brush Buchanan, was the first native New Englander to become a Roman Catholic nun. She was born and raised in Westminster and Burlington, Vermont; after her father’s death in 1789 she lived with her mother in Westminster before and after her mother’s marriage to Jabez Penniman. Fanny like her father Ethan was uncomfortable with some Protestant doctrines; when she went to Montreal in 1807 to learn French at the Convent School of the Sisters of the Congregation she came under the influence of Catholicism. At the convent she had a conversion experience, as told by her biographer, Bishop Louis De Goësbriand: “On a certain day, one of the Sisters, by a sort of inspiration, asked Fanny Allen to take a vase of flowers which she gave her, and to carry it upon the altar upon which the Holy Sacrament was present, recommending her to adore our Lord Jesus Christ when she would enter the sanctuary. The young lady started smiling, fully intending not to comply with the request; but as she opened the gate of the chancel she felt arrested by an invisible power, and quite unable to move a step. Three times did she endeavor to go up the sanctuary, and three times she failed in her attempt. Surprised and overcome she at last fell on her knees and in the sincerity of her soul adored Jesus Christ, of whose real presence in the Eucharist she then became fully convinced. Immediately after she withdrew to a remote part of the church where she shed abundance of tears and said to herself: ‘After this miraculous occurrence, I must give myself up to my Saviour.’ She, however, did not at once inform her teachers of what had happened, but desired to be instructed, and made up her mind some time after, to go to confession. After she was sufficiently instructed, she made her solemn abjuration [of her previous, Episcopal Church baptism], and was baptized by the parish priest of Montreal, Rev. L. Saulnier. . . . After her baptism she received her first communion, and on this very occasion resolved to embrace the religious life.” (Louis De Goësbriand, Catholic Memoirs of Vermont and New Hampshire (Burlington, VT, 1886, 14.)

            Upon returning to Vermont, her mother, stepfather, and friends were shocked to find her conversion to Catholicism; Vermont was, like all of New England, a place in which Protestants had long looked upon Roman Catholics with hatred. “The grief and indignation of her parents knew no bounds. They looked upon it as a most disgraceful infatuation. Peremptorily imposing silence upon her in relation to the subject, they determined to suppress it, if possible, until every means had been used to divert her mind from the fatal delusion.” (Goësbriand, 15) This reminds us of Jesus’ words, according to Luke, “Do you think I have come to bring peace to the earth? No, I have come to divide people against each other. From now on families will be split apart, three in favor of me, and two against—or two in favor and three against.” (Luke, 12, 51-52)

            Time passed, during which her mother accepted Fanny’s religious change, and agreed to take her to Montreal where she might find a community of nuns with whom to live. They visited the Church at the Hotel-Dieu of St. Joseph, where Fanny experienced an epiphany: “She hardly cast her eyes upon the painting of the holy family placed behind the great altar and beheld the face of St. Joseph, that she cried out and said to her mother: ‘That is himself. You see, mother, that St. Joseph wishes me to live here, he it was who saved me from the monster. She by these words reminded her mother of an event which had occurred when she was twelve years of age. As she was walking along a river and looking out upon the water which was much agitated, she saw arising out of it an enormous beast of monstrous shape which was coming towards her. In her terror she thought she could not take her eyes from it, nor stir from where she was, when all at once she thought she saw near her a venerable, bald-headed man, wrapped up in a brown cloak, and carrying a stick in his hand, who took hold of her arm, saying : “Little girl, what do you do here? make haste and run away.” At the sound of his voice she recovered her strength and made towards home in a hurry, turning about, however, to see the old man, but he had disappeared. When she reached home, her mother noticing her excited condition and the changed appearance of her features, understood that some extraordinary accident must have happened, and the child told her the best she could and the cause of her terror and the manner of her rescue by the old man.” (Goësbriand, 16.) Fanny immediately resolved to become one of Sisters of St. Joseph of the Hotel Dieu.

            Hotel-Dieu of St. Joseph in Montreal had a long and illustrious career when Fanny devoted her life to God. “In Montreal, the mission of St. Joseph on earth was . . . represented by the founding of the Hotel-Dieu, under the charge of the Sisters of St. Joseph. . . . The Sisters of St. Joseph of the Hotel- Dieu are true to the spirit of their first mother, and in their immense and admirable new hospital at the foot of the mountain in Montreal, they nearly always have some patients of Vermont or other New England States. There many are cured, owing, perhaps, more to the prayers and excellent nursing of the sisters than to the skill of their admirable physicians and surgeons. The Sisters of St. Joseph are a cloistered community. In their works of charity they are not encouraged by the hope of being praised by men. The remembrance of St. Joseph ministering to the Son of God, the honor in the sight of God attached to this office, the hope of the greater reward promised to works of mercy, are the chief incentives to their life of devotion.” (Goësbriand, 8-9) Fanny joined the convent in 1808, and there lived for nine years serving the poor and the sick, bringing to them the message of Christ in accord with the Great Commission.

            Fanny’s life is illustrative of what often happens when a person goes against comfort and expectation to take on a life-changing task. Fanny’s conversion upset the cohesiveness of family based on traditional ways of worship, challenging her mother’s Protestantism and her birth-father Ethan Allen’s Deism. She followed the will of her heavenly father over the remonstrances of her family and friends, but in so doing she taught her mother, stepfather, and friends that love for God required amazing sacrifices. As Louis Goësbriand related: When “Mr. Penniman and his wife came to Montreal to see her; they visited the monastery in all its details, were surprised to see how happy, contented and perfectly united amongst themselves were the Sisters of this community. They had imagined that Catholic Convents were no better than so many prisons, and they were so pleased with what they saw, that they continually spoke of the happiness of those Sisters, and congratulated the young novice on the choice of life she had made. She also felt so pleased to see her parents free from former prejudices against the religious life, that she seemed to grow more fervent in the service of God, and in the discharge of all the duties of her state. When the time of her profession had come (1810) many of her acquaintances of the United States came to witness this solemn action. They filled the whole chancel, and the church itself was quite full. All the Americans could not but wonder at seeing this young lady of Vermont shut herself up in a convent for the rest of her life.” (Goësbriand, 19)  It was truly an eye-opening experience for New Englanders traditionally brought up in an atmosphere of suspicion of Catholicism in general and convents in particular.

            Fanny lived out her life in love for others, both her family and friends as well as the mentally and physically ill at the Hotel-Dieu. Her life echoed what Pope Francis recently encouraged healing nuns to do, “to cultivate their service and love for the sick, always with joy and hope, never losing the joy in their hearts, and loving the most fragile persons.” https://www.vaticannews.va/en/church/news/2024-10/world-day-mental-health-interview-sisters-hospitaller.html

A version of this essay appeared in Catholic Exchange.

For more see American Catholics: An Encyclopedic History, Bloomsbury Publishing: https://www.amazon.com/American-Catholics-Encyclopedic-Russell-Lawson/dp/B0FPDCD57G/ref=books_amazonstores_desktop_mfs_aufs_ap_sc_dsk_1?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_w=amWGR&content-id=amzn1.sym.6d92b4c0-97d6-4063-b66e-20890dfbd616&pf_rd_p=6d92b4c0-97d6-4063-b66e-20890dfbd616&pf_rd_r=142-5197957-8175817&pd_rd_wg=7BluF&pd_rd_r=ff793b35-a49e-4f38-9f31-f263eec7cbec

Posted in Biography, Christianity, Great Commission | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ignatius of Loyola, Soldier for Christ

Ignatius of Loyola was a soldier for Navarre, Spain, who became a soldier for Christ. Recovering from battle wounds at his family’s castle in Loyola in the Basque region of Spain, he experienced conversion in which he renounced his former sinful ways of war, arrogance, and lust and took up the Cross of poverty, humility, and service to the Lord. He quit the military and renounced his former life, gave away all of his possessions, and became a wandering penitent. He journeyed to Rome and to Jerusalem as a pilgrim and formed a society of brethren in 1534 to serve the poor, which eventually became the Jesuit movement in 1540. Loyola’s Spiritual Exercises reveal his faith while the Autobiography reveals his actions taken for Christ.

            Loyola wrote the Spiritual Exercises for his disciples to help each individual to achieve freedom of the soul in discovering and conforming to God’s will. Loyola devised a plan of meditation that covered four weeks, more or less, depending on the energy and success of the disciple. The emphasis is on understanding that the role of humans on earth is to praise God; the rest of Creation assists each individual in this task. The individual charts sin and resolves through prayer to vanquish the enemy. The penitent contemplates Christ and His call to all humans to fight for the glory of God. The individual must make humility a work of art, humbling the self to God, rejecting all desire for earthly things, imitating Christ in poverty and suffering. The disciple learns to choose wisely: if God wills it, you accept it, and do it; to acquire knowledge, as to why the choice must be made; to make the choice, the decision to act, during a moment of tranquility. In making a choice, combine imagery and reason—but ultimately the decision rests on reason.

The Exercises require daily close personal examination to commune with God, recognize sin, and eradicate it. In each exercise, the individual imagines the sinful body, imagines the suffering Christ and identifies with Christ’s passion. Loyola’s technique is an active approach to meditation, wherein one contemplates an image and wills a response, merging reason, will, and empathy. The Exercises are an extended form of penance, self-denial in the extreme according to the imagery of Christ’s suffering.

The theme of Loyola’s life as described in his Autobiography was the fight against Satan for the souls of Christ. When he was enduring the pain of recuperation from his battle wounds, and a broken leg had to be set and reset, he learned to be grateful for the intense pain and resultant deformity, as it allowed him to grow in humility and to be a “martyr to his own pleasure.” After his recovery, and his decision to begin a new life, he was overwhelmed by his past sins, and was constantly caught between happiness and sadness, thoughts of redemption and sin; it was as if angels and demons waged war over him. He became obsessed with trying to meet God’s demands for his soul. In 1523 he journeyed to Jerusalem, guided by his soul, guided by visions, even one of Christ, which gave him certainty that he was on the right path. When he returned to Spain he decided to expand his learning, which would bring further spiritual insights. He studied Thomas Aquinas and Peter Lombard in particular. His teaching of spiritual exercises was brought to the attention of the Inquisition. In 1528 Loyola was at the University of Paris, winning converts because of the Spiritual Exercises. Yet he still felt uncertain and insecure. Once when attending to a plague-stricken person, he touched an infected boil and, terrified of acquiring the sickness but disdainful of his fear, plunged his hand into his mouth. In 1538, in Rome, he completed his Autobiography at the same time that he completed the Spiritual Exercises, his journey of body and soul now complete.

By this time Loyola had attracted many followers whom he called a Company of men devoted to Christ willing to share poverty, humility, and danger for the sake of spreading the Good News. The Society of Jesus was constituted by Pope Paul III in 1540. Loyola pledged loyalty to the Pope, organizing his men as soldiers of God without weapons save those of education, charity, spirituality, obedience, poverty, and humility. Loyola, believing in action for the sake of Christianity, inspired his followers, the Jesuits, to journey to far-away places to help others and spread the word of God. Francis Xavier, a Jesuit priest and friend, went as a missionary to China. Other Jesuits traveled to North, Central, and South America. Throughout their history the fervent dedication of the Jesuits has brought anger, jealousy, and suppression. But would Catholicism have been spread so effectively, its roots planted so deeply, in North America, without the work of the Jesuits?

Sources: The Autobiography of Ignatius Loyola, ed. John C. Olin, New York, Harper and Row, 1974; The Spiritual Exercises, New York: Doubleday & Co., 1964.

A version of this essay appeared in Catholic Exchange

For more see American Catholics: An Encyclopedic History, Bloomsbury Publishing: https://www.amazon.com/American-Catholics-Encyclopedic-Russell-Lawson/dp/B0FPDCD57G/ref=books_amazonstores_desktop_mfs_aufs_ap_sc_dsk_1?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_w=amWGR&content-id=amzn1.sym.6d92b4c0-97d6-4063-b66e-20890dfbd616&pf_rd_p=6d92b4c0-97d6-4063-b66e-20890dfbd616&pf_rd_r=142-5197957-8175817&pd_rd_wg=7BluF&pd_rd_r=ff793b35-a49e-4f38-9f31-f263eec7cbec

Posted in Biography, Christianity, Great Commission | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Jean Baptiste Lamy (1814-1888), Missionary Bishop on Horseback

Visitors to downtown Santa Fe are drawn to two majestic buildings, the Cathedral of St. Francis of Assisi and the Chapel of the Loretto Sisters. Little would one suspect today that the founder of these two buildings, indeed the father of American Catholicism in the southwestern states of New Mexico and Arizona, was a Frenchman who came to America for the express intent of following the Great Commission, that command by Christ to “Go into the world and preach the gospel to the whole creation.”

When Jean Baptiste Lamy arrived at Santa Fe in 1851 the city was an old Spanish capitol, founded 242 years before. Only recently at the end of the Mexican War the U.S. had taken control of the region politically and militarily, which necessitated commensurate ecclesiastical changes. The Vatican appointed the thirty-five-year-old Lamy Bishop Apostolic of the Diocese of New Mexico, a vast region of thousands of square miles encompassing the states of New Mexico, Arizona, western Texas, southern parts of Colorado and Nevada—in short, much of the vast borderland between Mexico and the United States. The land was sparsely settled, the farmers and ranchers harassed by aggressive Plains Indian tribes. The appointment was a surprise and an immense challenge for Lamy, who had only recently been a frontier parish priest in northern Kentucky and Ohio. Lamy had been ordained in Mont-Ferrand; recruited by Bishop Jean Purcell of Cincinnati, Lamy arrived in the United States in 1839. Twelve years later he journeyed down the Ohio to the Mississippi River, on to New Orleans, from there to Galveston by steamer followed by another sea journey to Matagorda Bay, then overland to San Antonio, eventually arriving at Santa Fe. He assumed control of a small town of mostly Mexicans served by a few priests who were basically on their own, the Bishop of Durango, Mexico, being fifteen hundred miles away. The sacraments in Lamy’s new diocese were rarely administered and the morals of the priests were not befitting the heritage and magisterium of the Catholic Church.

Lamy discovered that he was to be a missionary bishop on horseback. He took to the road, over and over, sometimes accompanied by soldiers, traders, guides, sometimes alone, in a forbidding country of vast deserts, few settlements, and Indian tribes discontented with the new authority of the United States. One of his first journeys was to take his Vatican credentials and travel to and from Durango over six months and three thousand miles to apprise Bishop José Antonio Laureano de Zubiría y Escalante of the change. In 1852 he journeyed to and from Baltimore to participate in a plenary council; on the return journey he stopped in Kentucky and recruited sisters of the Loretto mission to hazard the journey to New Mexico to establish a convent. Lamy made this harrowing journey numerous times, often in the company of priests and nuns, and frequently experiencing attack by the Apaches and other warlike tribes such as the Pueblo, Comanche, and Navajo. In July, 1867, for example, he escorted priests and sisters to Santa Fe when Plains Indians attacked. After a fierce battle, “Sister Alphonsa Thompson, a native of Kentucky, fell sick. Night settling we camped, and she being very ill received the last Sacraments. The other sisters waited on her all night, and the next day we had to continue our journey. She was put into a wagon with four other sisters, and when we had halted, she died at ten o’clock, July 24, being not quite twenty years old.” (Quoted in M. Lilliana Owens, “Our Lady of Light Academy, Santa Fe,” New Mexico Historical Review 13(1938))

Bishop Lamy realized that to turn around declining morals, which was a consequence of ignorance, schools must be built. The Loretto Sisters helped to fill the gulf, opening a school, Our Lady of Light Academy, in 1853. The challenge of educating the poor and ignorant grew over the years; Lamy’s diocese expanded to include Colorado and the region of the Gadsden Purchase acquired by the United States in 1854. During the Civil War, to find priests to assist in the Arizona Territory, Father Lamy journeyed to California, crossing Death Valley and the Mohave Desert. Along the way he chanced upon a settler who described the bishop as “a frank agreeable fascinating gentleman with the bonhomie of the Frenchman and the earnestness of the typical Christian. . . . A man of works rather than words, whose field of work is an empire, his diocese stretching from Denver to Mexico, from the Rio Grande to the Colorado.” (Quoted in Paul Horgan, Lamy of Santa Fe, 1975.)

Lamy sent his vicar general and close friend Father Joseph Machebeuf to Colorado to organize that part of his quickly growing diocese, centered in Denver. He frequently had occasion to make the journey north into the Rocky Mountains, such as in 1866, when he made the nine-hundred-mile trip, founding churches and confirming neophytes to the Catholic faith. The next year, 1867, he journeyed to Rome to report to Pope Pius IX of the 135,000 Catholics under his charge and the fifty-one priests he directed to serve them. Lamy became Archbishop in 1875 having spent twenty-four years in the desert southwest.

Recently Pope Francis has commemorated American missionaries in Puerto Rico to carry out the Great Commission with love. There is no better example of loving self-sacrifice than Jean-Baptiste Lamy. Willa Cather, in her fictional portrait of Lamy, Death Comes for the Archbishop (New York: Random House, 1990), wrote truly of Lamy and other missionaries in America: “Those early missionaries threw themselves naked upon the hard heart of a country that was calculated to try the endurance of giants. They thirsted in its deserts, starved among its rocks, climbed up and down its terrible canyons on stone-bruised feet, broke long fasts by unclean and repugnant food. Surely these endured Hunger, Thirst, Cold, Nakedness, of a kind beyond any conception St. Paul and his brethren could have had. Whatever the early Christians suffered, it all happened in that safe little Mediterranean world, amid the old manners, the old landmarks. If they endured martyrdom, they died among their brethren, their relics were piously preserved, their names lived in the mouths of holy men. Riding with his Auvergnats to the old missions that had been scenes of martyrdom, the Bishop [Lamy] used to remind them that no man could know what triumphs of faith had happened there, where one white man met torture and death alone among so many infidels, or what visions and revelations God may have granted to soften that brutal end.”

A version of this essay appeared in Catholic Exchange

For more see American Catholics: An Encyclopedic History, Bloomsbury Publishing: https://www.amazon.com/American-Catholics-Encyclopedic-Russell-Lawson/dp/B0FPDCD57G/ref=books_amazonstores_desktop_mfs_aufs_ap_sc_dsk_1?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_w=amWGR&content-id=amzn1.sym.6d92b4c0-97d6-4063-b66e-20890dfbd616&pf_rd_p=6d92b4c0-97d6-4063-b66e-20890dfbd616&pf_rd_r=142-5197957-8175817&pd_rd_wg=7BluF&pd_rd_r=ff793b35-a49e-4f38-9f31-f263eec7cbec

Posted in American History, Biography, Christianity, Great Commission | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment